CVE-2019-1649
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the logic that handles access control to one of the hardware components in Cisco's proprietary Secure Boot implementation could allow an authenticated, local attacker to write a modified firmware image to the component. This vulnerability affects multiple Cisco products that support hardware-based Secure Boot functionality. The vulnerability is due to an improper check on the area of code that manages on-premise updates to a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) part of the Secure Boot hardware implementation. An attacker with elevated privileges and access to the underlying operating system that is running on the affected device could exploit this vulnerability by writing a modified firmware image to the FPGA. A successful exploit could either cause the device to become unusable (and require a hardware replacement) or allow tampering with the Secure Boot verification process, which under some circumstances may allow the attacker to install and boot a malicious software image. An attacker will need to fulfill all the following conditions to attempt to exploit this vulnerability: Have privileged administrative access to the device. Be able to access the underlying operating system running on the device; this can be achieved either by using a supported, documented mechanism or by exploiting another vulnerability that would provide an attacker with such access. Develop or have access to a platform-specific exploit. An attacker attempting to exploit this vulnerability across multiple affected platforms would need to research each one of those platforms and then develop a platform-specific exploit. Although the research process could be reused across different platforms, an exploit developed for a given hardware platform is unlikely to work on a different hardware platform.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA logic flaw in Cisco's Secure Boot implementation allows an authenticated local attacker with privileged administrative access to write modified firmware to a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA). The vulnerability stems from an improper validation check in the code path that handles on-premise FPGA updates. Successful exploitation can either brick the device or tamper with Secure Boot verification, potentially allowing malicious software to boot.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.1.15< 2.6.1.134< 1.0.18< 1.0.18< 11.1all versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device model and firmware versionUse the CLI command 'show version' or access the device management interface to retrieve the exact model number and running firmware versionAffected if The device model matches one of the affected product lines (ASA 5500, Firepower 2100/4000/9000, ONS 15454 MSTP, Analog Voice NIMs, ISR T1/e1 NIMs, Supervisor A+) and the firmware version is below the fixed release for that product
-
Confirm the FPGA update capability is presentCheck if the device supports FPGA firmware updates through the administrative interface or CLI commands such as 'show hardware' or platform-specific FPGA version commandsAffected if The device has FPGA components that can be updated on-premise
-
Verify administrative access controlsReview user accounts with privileged (enable/level 15) access and check for any unauthorized administrative sessions or changes to privilege levelsAffected if Multiple privileged accounts exist or unauthorized privileged accounts are present that could perform FPGA updates
-
Review system logs for FPGA-related operationsExamine system logs, audit trails, or security logs for any FPGA firmware update, reload, or Secure Boot modification events that were not initiated by authorized administratorsAffected if FPGA update events appear in logs without corresponding authorized administrative action
-
Check for signs of device compromise or instabilityLook for unexpected device behavior, repeated reloads, boot failures, or Secure Boot verification errors in system logs and console outputAffected if The device exhibits unexplained instability, boot issues, or Secure Boot validation failures
The device is affected if it matches an affected product model with a firmware version below the fixed release and has FPGA update capability accessible to privileged users
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data1.0.181.1.152.6.1.134
Apply Cisco-provided firmware updates that address the Secure Boot FPGA validation flaw. Restrict administrative access and monitor for unauthorized OS-level access that could be used as a stepping stone. Since exploitation requires both privileged access and platform-specific knowledge, prioritizing patches on exposed devices is critical.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $12,352.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-1649 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-1649 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data