Jabber Extensible Communications PlatformApplication · Cisco

CVE-2011-3287

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v2.0 Published 2011-10-06
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 5.8 or later.
See remediation →
87/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cisco Jabber Extensible Communications Platform (aka Jabber XCP) 2.x through 5.4.x before 5.4.0.27581 and 5.8.x before 5.8.1.27561 does not properly detect recursion during entity expansion, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory and CPU consumption, and process crash) via a crafted XML document containing a large number of nested entity references, aka Bug ID CSCtq78106, a similar issue to CVE-2003-1564.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Cisco Jabber XCP fails to properly detect recursion during XML entity expansion, allowing remote attackers to send crafted XML documents with deeply nested entity references. This causes excessive memory and CPU consumption, leading to denial of service and process crashes (similar to the Billion Laughs attack).

MitigationUpgrade to Cisco Jabber XCP version 5.4.0.27581, 5.8.1.27561, or later. If immediate patching is not feasible, consider XML parser configuration to limit entity expansion depth and disable external entity processing at the network edge.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Jabber Extensible Communications PlatformApplication
Affected:<= 5.8<= 5.4= 5.0= 5.1= 5.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Cisco Jabber XCP installation
    Locate the Cisco Jabber XCP installation directory and check for version information files (such as version.txt, about dialog, or executable version properties)
    Affected if The installed version is 5.0, 5.1, 5.2, 5.4 any version up to and including 5.4, or any version up to and including 5.8 (versions prior to 5.4.0.27581 or 5.8.1.27561)
  2. Determine Jabber client version
    For Cisco Jabber client installations, check the application version through Help > About or the executable properties (right-click on jabber.exe, select Properties, view Version tab)
    Affected if The client version falls within the affected ranges listed above
  3. Verify XML parser entity expansion limits
    Examine any configurable XML parser settings or configuration files associated with the Jabber installation for limits on entity expansion depth (such as XXE protection settings or XML security policies)
    Affected if No entity expansion depth limits are configured or limits are set to very high values allowing deeply nested entities
  4. Check for external entity processing configuration
    Review network edge devices, proxies, or application-level XML processing configurations for settings that control external entity processing
    Affected if External entity processing is enabled and not restricted

You are affected if Cisco Jabber XCP version is 5.0, 5.1, 5.2, any version 5.4.x up to 5.4.0.27580, or any version 5.5.x-5.8.x up to 5.8.1.27560, and XML parser entity expansion limits are not configured.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 5.8
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to Cisco Jabber XCP version 5.4.0.27581, 5.8.1.27561, or later. If immediate patching is not feasible, consider XML parser configuration to limit entity expansion depth and disable external entity processing at the network edge.

Fix this in Jabber Extensible Communications Platform Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,390
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2011-3287 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2011-3287 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data