Jabber Extensible Communications PlatformApplication · Cisco

CVE-2013-1187

MEDIUM · 5.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2013-04-16
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The Connection Manager in Cisco Jabber Extensible Communications Platform (aka Jabber XCP) does not properly validate login data, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (service crash) by sending a series of malformed login packets, aka Bug ID CSCts76762.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The Connection Manager in Cisco Jabber Extensible Communications Platform (Jabber XCP) fails to properly validate login data, allowing remote attackers to send malformed login packets that cause the service to crash, resulting in denial of service.

MitigationApply the relevant Cisco patch for Bug ID CSCts76762. If unavailable, implement network-level mitigations such as rate limiting on login endpoints and blocking sources sending malformed packets.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Jabber Extensible Communications PlatformApplication
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if Cisco Jabber XCP is installed
    Check for Cisco Jabber XCP processes or installed software on the system. Look for process names like 'Jabber' or 'XCP' in running processes, or check installed programs for Cisco Jabber.
    Affected if The software is present on the system
  2. Confirm the Connection Manager component is running
    Check for the Cisco Jabber XCP Connection Manager service or process. This is typically a service that handles client connections and authentication.
    Affected if The Connection Manager service is active and listening for connections
  3. Check network exposure of the Connection Manager
    Identify which ports the Connection Manager is listening on (typically ports in the 5220-5229 range for XMPP, or as configured). Use netstat or similar tools to list listening ports and identify which are externally accessible.
    Affected if The Connection Manager is exposed to untrusted networks or the internet
  4. Review service availability and crash logs
    Check system and application logs for evidence of the Connection Manager service crashing, restarting unexpectedly, or logging authentication-related errors. Look for patterns around login/authentication events.
    Affected if The service has experienced unexplained crashes or restarts, particularly following login attempts
  5. Identify the installed version
    Check the installed version of Cisco Jabber XCP if possible. Since all versions are affected, this confirms exposure rather than susceptibility.
    Affected if Any version of Cisco Jabber XCP is installed (all versions are affected)

The environment is affected if Cisco Jabber XCP Connection Manager is installed and accessible, since all versions of this product are vulnerable to denial of service via malformed login packets.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the relevant Cisco patch for Bug ID CSCts76762. If unavailable, implement network-level mitigations such as rate limiting on login endpoints and blocking sources sending malformed packets.

Fix this in Jabber Extensible Communications Platform Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,920
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,072.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-1187 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-1187 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data