CVE-2011-3298
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCisco Adaptive Security Appliances (ASA) 5500 series devices, and the ASA Services module in Cisco Catalyst 6500 series devices, with software 7.0 before 7.0(8.13), 7.1 and 7.2 before 7.2(5.3), 8.0 before 8.0(5.24), 8.1 before 8.1(2.50), 8.2 before 8.2(5), 8.3 before 8.3(2.18), 8.4 before 8.4(1.10), and 8.5 before 8.5(1.1) and Cisco Firewall Services Module (aka FWSM) 3.1 before 3.1(21), 3.2 before 3.2(22), 4.0 before 4.0(16), and 4.1 before 4.1(7) allow remote attackers to bypass authentication via a crafted TACACS+ reply, aka Bug IDs CSCto40365 and CSCto74274.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCisco ASA 5500 series and FWSM devices contain an authentication bypass vulnerability in the TACACS+ authentication handling. Remote attackers can send a crafted TACACS+ reply packet to bypass authentication and gain unauthorized access to the security appliance. This affects both the ASA platform and the Firewall Services Module in Catalyst 6500 switches.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.0= 7.0\(0\)= 7.0\(1\)= 7.0\(2\)= 7.0\(4\)= 7.0\(5\)= 7.0\(5.2\)= 7.0\(6\)= 7.0\(6.7\)= 7.0\(7\)= 7.0\(8\)= 7.0.1all versionsall versions= 3.1= 3.1\(2\)= 3.1\(3\)= 3.1\(4\)= 3.1\(5\)= 3.1\(6\)= 3.1\(7\)= 3.1\(8\)= 3.1\(9\)= 3.1\(10\)= 3.1\(11\)= 3.1\(12\)all versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:A/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device modelRun 'show version' or 'show hardware' to confirm the device is a Cisco ASA 5500 series, ASA 5500-X series, or FWSM in a Catalyst 6500/7600 switchAffected if Device is an ASA 5500 series or FWSM module (exact model appears in the output)
-
Check the ASA software versionRun 'show version' and locate the 'Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance Software' version lineAffected if Version starts with 7.0 followed by any of: (0), (1), (2), (4), (5), (5.2), (6), (6.7), (7), (8), or 7.0.1 - or if it is any version of Cisco ASA 5500 series (8.x, 9.x, etc.) since 'all versions' are listed as affected
-
Check the FWSM software versionFor FWSM, run 'show module' from the Catalyst switch or 'show version' on the FWSMAffected if Version is 3.1, 3.1(2), 3.1(3), 3.1(4), 3.1(5), 3.1(6), 3.1(7), 3.1(8), 3.1(9), 3.1(10), 3.1(11), or 3.1(12)
-
Verify TACACS+ authentication is configuredRun 'show running-config | include tacacs' or 'show aaa server' to check if TACACS+ servers are defined and used for authenticationAffected if TACACS+ server is configured and assigned as the authentication method (aaa authentication command, login, etc.)
-
Confirm the device is using TACACS+ for administrative accessRun 'show running-config | include aaa authentication' to see which services use TACACS+ authenticationAffected if TACACS+ is used for any login, enable, or administrative authentication (such as 'aaa authentication ssh console tacacs+' or similar)
A user is affected if they have a vulnerable ASA 5500 series or FWSM device running the listed versions AND have TACACS+ authentication enabled and in use for device access.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Cisco ASA software to version 7.0(8.13), 7.2(5.3), 8.0(5.24), 8.1(2.50), 8.2(5), 8.3(2.18), 8.4(1.10), or 8.5(1.1) and later, and upgrade FWSM to 3.1(21), 3.2(22), 4.0(16), 4.1(7) or later. If immediate patching is not possible, consider implementing additional network-level controls to restrict TACACS+ traffic to trusted sources.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,448.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2011-3298 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2011-3298 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data