CVE-2011-4501
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe UPnP IGD implementation in Edimax EdiLinux on the Edimax BR-6104K with firmware before 3.25, Edimax 6114Wg, Canyon-Tech CN-WF512 with firmware 1.83, Canyon-Tech CN-WF514 with firmware 2.08, Sitecom WL-153 with firmware before 1.39, and Sweex LB000021 with firmware 3.15 allows remote attackers to establish arbitrary port mappings by sending a UPnP AddPortMapping action in a SOAP request to the WAN interface, related to an "external forwarding" vulnerability.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMultiple router models (Edimax BR-6104K, Edimax 6114Wg, Canyon-Tech CN-WF512/514, Sitecom WL-153, Sweex LB000021) have UPnP IGD exposed on the WAN interface without authentication, allowing remote attackers to send SOAP AddPortMapping requests that create arbitrary port forwarding rules from the internet to internal network devices.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.21all versions= 1.83= 2.08all versionsall versions= 1.83= 2.08all versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the router modelAccess the router's web administration interface (typically at 192.168.1.1 or 192.168.0.1) and locate the device information or status page to confirm the exact model numberAffected if The device is one of: Edimax BR-6104K, Edimax 6114WG, Canyon-Tech CN-WF512, Canyon-Tech CN-WF514, Sitecom WL-153, or Sweex LB000021
-
Check the firmware versionIn the router's web interface, navigate to the firmware or system information section and note the installed firmware version numberAffected if The firmware version matches one listed in affected versions or is any version for models noted as 'all versions'
-
Verify UPnP is enabled on the WAN interfaceIn the router's web interface, locate the UPnP settings (usually under Advanced, NAT, or Port Forwarding settings) and confirm whether UPnP IGD is enabled and whether it applies to the WAN connectionAffected if UPnP IGD is enabled and configured to operate on the WAN (external) interface
-
Test for external UPnP accessibilityFrom an external network (not behind the router), use a UDP port scanner or simple tool to send a packet to the router's public IP address on port 1900 (the UPnP SSDP multicast port) and observe if a response is receivedAffected if The router responds to UPnP SSDP queries on port 1900/UDP from the WAN side, indicating UPnP is exposed externally
A user is affected if they own one of the listed router models, the device has UPnP IGD enabled on the WAN interface, and port 1900/UDP is accessible from the internet.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedDisable UPnP functionality on the WAN interface or block external access to UPnP ports (1900/UDP) at the perimeter firewall; update affected devices to patched firmware versions where available.
Edimax BR-6104K: firmware 3.25+ | Sitecom WL-153: firmware 1.39+ | Other models: contact vendor for fixed firmware
- 1. Identify the exact router model from the affected list (BR-6104K, 6114Wg, CN-WF512, CN-WF514, WL-153, or LB000021)
- 2. Access the router's web administration interface via LAN connection
- 3. Navigate to the firmware or system settings section to check the current firmware version
- 4. For Edimax BR-6104K: Download firmware version 3.25 or later from the official Edimax support website
- 5. For Sitecom WL-153: Download firmware version 1.39 or later from the official Sitecom support website
- 6. For Canyon-Tech CN-WF512/CN-WF514: Check vendor for firmware updates beyond 1.83/2.08 respectively
- 7. Upload the firmware file through the router's web interface and wait for installation to complete
- 8. After reboot, verify the new firmware version is installed
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2011-4501 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2011-4501 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data