CVE-2011-4502
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe UPnP IGD implementation in Edimax EdiLinux on the Edimax BR-6104K with firmware before 3.25, Edimax 6114Wg, Canyon-Tech CN-WF512 with firmware 1.83, Canyon-Tech CN-WF514 with firmware 2.08, Sitecom WL-153 with firmware before 1.39, and Sweex LB000021 with firmware 3.15 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe UPnP IGD (Internet Gateway Device) implementation in multiple router firmwares contains a command injection vulnerability. Remote attackers can execute arbitrary operating system commands by including shell metacharacters in specially crafted UPnP requests to the affected service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.21all versions= 1.83= 2.08all versionsall versions= 1.83= 2.08all versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the router modelLog into the router web administration interface and locate the device information or status page to confirm the exact model number (e.g., Edimax BR-6104k, Canyon Tech CN-WF512, Edimax 6114wg)Affected if The device model matches any of the affected models listed in the CVE (Edimax BR-6104k, Canyon Tech CN-WF512, Canyon Tech CN-WF514, Edimax 6114wg)
-
Check the installed firmware versionIn the router admin interface, locate the firmware version or software version information (usually under Status, System, or Maintenance sections) and note the exact version numberAffected if The firmware version matches any of the specific versions listed in the CVE (Edimax 3.21, Canyon Tech 1.83, Canyon Tech 2.08, Edimax 1.83 or 2.08) OR if the device is an affected model running ANY firmware version (since some product entries list 'all versions')
-
Verify UPnP IGD service statusIn the router admin interface, navigate to the UPnP settings or Port Forwarding settings section and check if UPnP (Universal Plug and Play) or UPnP IGD (Internet Gateway Device) is enabled or turned onAffected if UPnP or UPnP IGD functionality is currently enabled on the device
-
Confirm UPnP service is accessible on the networkFrom a computer on the local network, scan the router's internal IP address for open UPnP ports (typically port 1900/UDP for SSDP and TCP ports 49152-49155 for UPnP) or use a UPnP discovery tool to check if the device responds to UPnP discovery requestsAffected if The router responds to UPnP discovery requests and exposes the IGD service on the network
You are affected if your device is one of the listed models AND UPnP IGD is enabled and accessible, regardless of firmware version for models marked 'all versions' or if your specific firmware version matches the vulnerable versions listed.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedDisable UPnP functionality on affected devices if not required, or upgrade firmware to patched versions where available. For unsupported devices, consider network segmentation and blocking external UPnP traffic at the perimeter.
Edimax BR-6104K: firmware 3.25 or later; Edimax 6114Wg: latest available firmware; Canyon-Tech CN-WF512: latest available firmware; Canyon-Tech CN-WF514: latest available firmware
- 1. Identify the exact model number of the router (BR-6104K, 6114Wg, CN-WF512, CN-WF514, or other affected model).
- 2. Visit the official vendor website for your specific router model to download the latest firmware.
- 3. For Edimax BR-6104K: Download firmware version 3.25 or later from the Edimax support page.
- 4. Access the router's web administration interface (typically at 192.168.1.1 or 192.168.2.1).
- 5. Navigate to the Firmware Upgrade or Administration section.
- 6. Upload the downloaded firmware file and initiate the upgrade.
- 7. Wait for the upgrade to complete and the router to reboot.
- 8. After reboot, verify the new firmware version is installed.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,680.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2011-4502 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2011-4502 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data