Tivoli Netcool\/reporterApplication · Ibm

CVE-2011-4668

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v2.0 Published 2011-12-02
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
IBM Tivoli Netcool/Reporter 2.2 before 2.2.0.8 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via vectors related to an unspecified CGI program used with the Apache HTTP Server.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

IBM Tivoli Netcool/Reporter versions 2.2 through 2.2.0.7 contain a vulnerability in an unspecified CGI program when used with Apache HTTP Server, allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors.

MitigationUpgrade IBM Tivoli Netcool/Reporter to version 2.2.0.8 or later to address the vulnerability; alternatively, identify and disable the vulnerable CGI program in Apache until the patch can be applied.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Tivoli Netcool\/reporterApplication
Affected:= 2.2.0= 2.2.0.1= 2.2.0.2= 2.2.0.3= 2.2.0.4= 2.2.0.5= 2.2.0.6= 2.2.0.7

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if IBM Tivoli Netcool/Reporter is installed
    Search for the product installation directory or check system inventory/package manager for IBM Tivoli Netcool/Reporter
    Affected if The product is found on the system
  2. Determine the installed version of IBM Tivoli Netcool/Reporter
    Locate the version information file or binary within the Netcool/Reporter installation directory and compare the version to the affected range 2.2.0 through 2.2.0.7
    Affected if The installed version is 2.2.0, 2.2.0.1, 2.2.0.2, 2.2.0.3, 2.2.0.4, 2.2.0.5, 2.2.0.6, or 2.2.0.7
  3. Verify if Apache HTTP Server is configured and running with CGI support
    Check the Apache configuration files (httpd.conf or included config files) for CGI module loading (LoadModule cgi_module) and ScriptAlias or AddHandler directives for CGI execution
    Affected if Apache HTTP Server is running with CGI module enabled and CGI script execution permitted
  4. Locate CGI programs within the Netcool/Reporter installation
    Examine the CGI-bin directories within the Netcool/Reporter installation for any CGI scripts that may be accessible via Apache
    Affected if CGI programs exist in the Netcool/Reporter web accessible directories and are reachable through Apache
  5. Review Apache configuration for CGI script mappings to Netcool/Reporter
    Inspect Apache configuration for Alias or ScriptAlias directives that map URL paths to CGI directories within the Netcool/Reporter installation
    Affected if URL paths are configured in Apache that expose Netcool/Reporter CGI programs

A system is likely affected if IBM Tivoli Netcool/Reporter version 2.2.0 through 2.2.0.7 is installed and configured to run with Apache HTTP Server using CGI functionality.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade IBM Tivoli Netcool/Reporter to version 2.2.0.8 or later to address the vulnerability; alternatively, identify and disable the vulnerable CGI program in Apache until the patch can be applied.

Fix this in Tivoli Netcool\/reporter Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2011-4668 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2011-4668 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data