Jboss Operations NetworkApplication · Redhat

CVE-2012-0062

MEDIUM · 5.8 CVSS v2.0 Published 2014-02-14
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 2.4.1 or later.
See remediation →
67/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Red Hat JBoss Operations Network (JON) before 2.4.2 and 3.0.x before 3.0.1 allows remote attackers to hijack agent sessions via an agent registration request without a security token.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Red Hat JBoss Operations Network has a session hijacking vulnerability in the agent registration process. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to hijack agent sessions because agent registration requests are accepted without validating a security token, enabling attackers to impersonate legitimate agents.

MitigationUpgrade JBoss Operations Network to version 2.4.2 or 3.0.1 or later, which includes proper security token validation during agent registration. If upgrading is not immediately possible, consider network segmentation to limit exposure of the agent registration interface.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Jboss Operations NetworkApplication
Affected:<= 2.4.1= 2.0.0= 2.0.1= 2.1.0= 2.2= 2.3= 2.3.1= 2.4= 3.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
M
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
None

AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if JBoss Operations Network is installed
    Look for JBoss ON processes running on the system (e.g., ps aux | grep -i jboss or check for JBoss ON service processes). Also check for JBoss ON installation directories such as $JBOSS_HOME/../jboss-on or /opt/jboss-on.
    Affected if JBoss Operations Network is installed and running on the system
  2. Determine the installed JBoss ON version
    Check the version file in the JBoss ON installation directory. Common locations include: installation_dir/bin/run.sh --version, or look for a version.txt or version.properties file in the installation root. The version can also be found in the server management console under 'About' or in the platform server properties.
    Affected if The installed version matches 2.0.0, 2.0.1, 2.1.0, 2.2, 2.3, 2.3.1, 2.4, 2.4.1, or 3.0 (any version <= 2.4.1 or exactly 3.0)
  3. Determine if the agent registration interface is network-accessible
    Check the network configuration and firewall rules to see if the JBoss ON agent registration port (typically port 16163 or the configured agent registration port) is exposed to untrusted networks. Review the server.xml or jboss-service.xml for the agent registration connector binding address.
    Affected if The agent registration port (default 16163) is accessible from untrusted networks or the binding address is set to 0.0.0.0 (all interfaces) without proper network segmentation

The system is affected if JBoss Operations Network version 2.0.0 through 2.4.1 or version 3.0 is running with the agent registration interface network-accessible, allowing potential remote attackers to hijack agent sessions without security token validation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 2.4.1
Interim mitigation

Upgrade JBoss Operations Network to version 2.4.2 or 3.0.1 or later, which includes proper security token validation during agent registration. If upgrading is not immediately possible, consider network segmentation to limit exposure of the agent registration interface.

Fix this in Jboss Operations Network Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-0062 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-0062 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data