CVE-2012-0500
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) component in Oracle Java SE 7 Update 2 and earlier, 6 Update 30 and earlier, and JavaFX 2.0.2 and earlier allows remote untrusted Java Web Start applications and untrusted Java applets to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors related to Deployment.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA critical vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment's Deployment component allowed remote attackers to bypass Java's sandbox security model through malicious Java Web Start applications or Java applets, enabling complete system compromise (confidentiality, integrity, and availability). The attack vector required user interaction (visiting malicious webpage or launching malicious JWS app).
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.6.0= 1.6.0<= 1.7.0= 1.7.0= 1.6.0<= 2.0.2= 1.2= 1.2.2= 1.2.3= 1.3.0= 1.3.1= 2.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Java Runtime Environment versionRun 'java -version' from command line or check the Java Control Panel (Java > General > About) for the installed version numberAffected if The version is 1.6.0 (any update), 1.7.0 (any update), or falls within the JavaFX affected ranges (1.2, 1.2.2, 1.2.3, 1.3.0, 1.3.1, 2.0, or <= 2.0.2)
-
Determine if Java browser plug-in is enabledIn Windows, check browser add-on settings (Internet Options > Programs > Manage Add-ons) for 'Java Plug-in' status, or check if Java is listed in browser's enabled extensions/pluginsAffected if The Java browser plug-in is listed as Enabled or Always Active in any web browser on the system
-
Verify Java Web Start (javaws) availabilityCheck if javaws.exe exists in the Java installation directory (typically under C:\Program Files\Java\jre*\bin\) or run 'javaws -version' from command lineAffected if Java Web Start is installed and present on the system
-
Confirm Java security configuration for appletsOpen Java Control Panel > Security tab and check the security level setting, or inspect the deployment.properties file in the Java deployment directoryAffected if Security level is set to Medium or High (the vulnerability could still be triggered depending on the specific attack vector)
You are affected if your installed Java/JaFX version matches the affected ranges AND either the Java browser plug-in or Java Web Start is enabled on your system, as these are required vectors for the sandbox bypass.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate Java to version 7 Update 3 or later, 6 Update 31 or later (or JavaFX 2.1+). As interim workarounds, disable Java browser plug-in or set Java security settings to 'High' and restrict untrusted applets.
Java 6 to 6u31+/7u3+ (or migrate to currently supported Java 8/11/17 LTS), JavaFX 2.1+
- Identify all systems with affected Java installations (JRE 1.6.0 through 1.6.0 Update 30, JRE 1.7.0 through 1.7.0 Update 2, and JavaFX 2.0.2 and earlier)
- For Java 6.x systems: upgrade to Java 6 Update 31 or later (or migrate to a supported Java version)
- For Java 7.x systems: upgrade to Java 7 Update 3 or later
- For JavaFX systems: upgrade to JavaFX 2.1 or later
- After upgrading, clear Java Web Start cache (javaws -uninstall or via Java Control Panel)
- Restart any Java Web Start applications and verify they function correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-0500 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-0500 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data