CVE-2012-3053
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedBuffer overflow in the Cisco WebEx Advanced Recording Format (ARF) player T27 L through SP11 EP26, T27 LB through SP21 EP10, T27 LC before SP25 EP11, T27 LD before SP32 CP2, and T28 L10N before SP1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted ARF file, aka Bug ID CSCtz72985.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBuffer overflow vulnerability in Cisco WebEx Advanced Recording Format (ARF) player allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted ARF file. Multiple affected version ranges exist across T27 and T28 product lines.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 27.11.0, <= 27.11.26>= 27.21.0, <= 27.21.10>= 27.25.0, < 27.25.11>= 27.32.0, < 27.32.2>= 28.0.0, < 28.0.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Cisco WebEx ARF player is installedOn Windows, open Control Panel > Programs and Features, or run 'appwiz.cpl', and look for entries containing 'WebEx' or 'Advanced Recording Format Player'. On macOS, check /Applications for WebEx folder or use Spotlight to search for 'WebEx' or 'ARF Player'.Affected if No WebEx ARF player software is found on the system.
-
Determine the installed version numberIn Windows Programs and Features, select the WebEx ARF player entry and note the version shown in the details pane, or right-click and select Properties > Details to view the Version field. On macOS, right-click the WebEx application in Applications, select Get Info, and note the Version field.Affected if The version cannot be determined or the software is not listed.
-
Compare installed version against affected rangesCheck if the installed version falls within any of these ranges: 27.11.0 through 27.11.26, 27.21.0 through 27.21.10, 27.25.0 through 27.25.10, 27.32.0 through 27.32.1, or 28.0.0.Affected if The installed version matches any of the affected version ranges listed.
-
Verify ARF file handling capability existsCheck if .arf file association exists on the system. On Windows, search for files with .arf extension or check the default file associations in Settings > Apps > Default Apps > Choose default apps by file type. Also look for WebEx recording-related files in common document directories.Affected if ARF file associations are present and the player can process these files.
A user is affected if the Cisco WebEx ARF player is installed with a version matching any of the specified vulnerable ranges and the system can open or process ARF files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped27.25.1127.32.228.0.1
Update affected Cisco WebEx ARF player installations to the patched versions specified in Cisco's security advisory. Implement network-based controls to block untrusted ARF files until patches are applied.
Upgrade to the following minimum fixed versions based on your current branch: T27 L: 27.11.27+; T27 LB: 27.21.11+; T27 LC: 27.25.11+; T27 LD: 27.32.2+; T28 L10N: SP1+
- 1. Identify the currently installed Cisco WebEx ARF player version by opening the player and checking 'Help' > 'About'
- 2. Determine which version branch you are on (T27 L, T27 LB, T27 LC, T27 LD, or T28 L10N)
- 3. For T27 L (27.11.x): Upgrade to version 27.11.27 or later
- 4. For T27 LB (27.21.x): Upgrade to version 27.21.11 or later
- 5. For T27 LC (27.25.x): Upgrade to version 27.25.11 or later
- 6. For T27 LD (27.32.x): Upgrade to version 27.32.2 or later
- 7. For T28 L10N: Upgrade to SP1 or later
- 8. Obtain the updated player from the official Cisco WebEx download site or your organization's software distribution
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $10,240.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-3053 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-3053 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data