CVE-2014-2134
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedHeap-based buffer overflow in Cisco WebEx Recording Format (WRF) player T27 LD before SP32 EP16, T28 before T28.12, and T29 before T29.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption and application crash) via a crafted audio channel in a .wrf file, aka Bug ID CSCuc39458.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceHeap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in Cisco WebEx WRF player when parsing crafted audio channels in .wrf files. The overflow occurs during audio stream processing, allowing attackers to overwrite heap memory and achieve remote code execution or cause denial of service through memory corruption.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= t27ld= t28= t29= t27ld= t28= t29CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Cisco WebEx WRF player installationCheck for WebEx WRF player (wrfplayer.exe) in typical installation directories such as C:\Program Files\WebEx\WebEx Recording Format Player or C:\Program Files\Cisco\WebEx\WebEx Recording Format Player. Also check Add/Remove Programs for WebEx recording format related entries.Affected if The player software is present on the system
-
Determine installed WRF player versionRight-click wrfplayer.exe, select Properties, then view the Details tab for version information. Alternatively, run 'wrfplayer.exe -version' from command line if supported.Affected if Version matches t27ld, t28, or t29 exactly (these are the affected versions)
-
Check .wrf file associationOpen Windows Explorer, navigate to a .wrf file if present, right-click and select Properties, then Open With > Choose Default Program to see if WebEx WRF player is associated with .wrf files.Affected if WRF player is set as the default handler for .wrf files and could be invoked by opening such files
-
Verify audio channel parsing is enabledThe vulnerability triggers when parsing audio channels within .wrf files. Check if the player has audio playback capabilities enabled in its settings/preferences.Affected if Audio playback feature is enabled in the player settings
A user is affected if Cisco WebEx WRF player version t27ld, t28, or t29 is installed and the player can open .wrf files, allowing the heap overflow to trigger during audio stream processing.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor patches (T27 SP32 EP16, T28.12, T29.2 or later). Until patched, restrict opening .wrf files from untrusted sources and consider network-based controls to block malicious WRF files.
T27 LD: SP32 EP16 or later | T28: T28.12 or later | T29: T29.2 or later
- 1. Identify the installed Cisco WebEx Recording Format (WRF) Player version by checking the About section in the player or the program's version properties
- 2. If running T27 LD version before SP32 EP16, download and install SP32 EP16 or later from Cisco's official download site
- 3. If running T28 version before T28.12, download and install T28.12 or later from Cisco's official download site
- 4. If running T29 version before T29.2, download and install T29.2 or later from Cisco's official download site
- 5. Verify the installation completed successfully by checking the updated version number
- 6. Test that .wrf files open correctly in the updated player
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-2134 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-2134 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data