CVE-2012-3088
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client 3.1.x before 3.1.00495, and 3.2.x, does not check whether an HTTP request originally contains ScanSafe headers, which allows remote attackers to have an unspecified impact via a crafted request, aka Bug ID CSCua13166.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client versions 3.1.x before 3.1.00495 and 3.2.x fail to validate the presence of ScanSafe security headers in HTTP requests. This allows remote attackers to craft malicious HTTP requests that bypass the cloud-based web security scanning, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution or traffic manipulation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.1.0= 3.2.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Cisco AnyConnect is installedCheck for the presence of Cisco AnyConnect on the system. On Windows, look in Program Files for 'Cisco' or check the installed programs list. On macOS, check /Applications for Cisco AnyConnect. On Linux, check common installation paths like /opt/cisco/anyconnect.Affected if AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client is installed on the system
-
Determine the installed versionOn Windows, open Add or Remove Programs and locate Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client to view the version number. On macOS, right-click the app in Applications and select Get Info to see the version. On Linux, run 'vpn' at the command line and look for version information, or check the .pkg or .dmg metadata.Affected if The version is 3.1.0 or 3.2.0, or falls within 3.1.x before 3.1.00495 or any 3.2.x version
-
Confirm ScanSafe web security feature is enabledOpen the AnyConnect client and check the preferences or connection settings for ScanSafe or web security configuration. Look for any settings related to web protection, cloud security scanning, or ScanSafe. This may also be configured via group policy on Windows systems.Affected if The ScanSafe or web security scanning feature is enabled and processing HTTP traffic
-
Inspect AnyConnect connection logsReview AnyConnect logs for any ScanSafe-related entries during VPN sessions. Logs are typically found in the system temp directory or under the Cisco AnyConnect profile directory. Search for entries mentioning 'ScanSafe', 'web security', or HTTP header processing.Affected if Logs show active ScanSafe web security scanning in use
The system is affected if Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client version 3.1.0, 3.2.0, or any 3.1.x before 3.1.00495 or 3.2.x is installed AND the ScanSafe/web security feature is enabled to process HTTP traffic.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Cisco AnyConnect Client to version 3.1.00495 or later to resolve the header validation bypass. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict network access and monitor for anomalous HTTP traffic patterns.
Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client 3.1.00495 or later (for 3.1.x); latest 3.2.x release with security fixes (for 3.2.x)
- 1. Verify the currently installed Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client version by checking Add/Remove Programs or the client UI
- 2. Download Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client version 3.1.00495 or later from the Cisco official download site (requires valid Cisco service contract)
- 3. Ensure any VPN connections are disconnected before upgrading
- 4. Uninstall the current version of Cisco AnyConnect through Windows Add/Remove Programs or the installer
- 5. Restart the endpoint system
- 6. Install the new version (3.1.00495 or later for 3.1.x line, or the latest available 3.2.x version that includes the fix)
- 7. Verify the installation completed successfully and note the new version number
- 8. Test VPN connectivity to ensure the client functions properly after upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-3088 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-3088 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data