CVE-2021-40124
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the Network Access Manager (NAM) module of Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client for Windows could allow an authenticated, local attacker to escalate privileges on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to incorrect privilege assignment to scripts executed before user logon. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by configuring a script to be executed before logon. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code with SYSTEM privileges.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a privilege escalation vulnerability in Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client's Network Access Manager (NAM) module for Windows. Scripts configured to execute before user logon run with SYSTEM privileges instead of properly restricted privileges. An authenticated local attacker can configure a malicious script to execute pre-logon and achieve arbitrary code execution with SYSTEM-level privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 4.10.03104CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Cisco AnyConnect installation and versionCheck the installed version by querying the Windows Registry key: HKLM\SOFTWARE\Cisco\AnyConnect\CurrentVersion, or examine the file version of 'AnyConnect.exe' in the program files directory (commonly C:\Program Files\Cisco\Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client\).Affected if The installed version is less than 4.10.03104.
-
Confirm Network Access Manager module is presentCheck if the NAM module is installed by looking for the presence of the 'NAM' directory under the Cisco AnyConnect installation path, or check the Windows service named 'Cisco AnyConnect NAM Service' (service display name typically contains 'Network Access Manager').Affected if The NAM module is installed and the service exists.
-
Identify configured pre-logon scriptsExamine the NAM configuration for pre-logon scripts. Check the Windows Registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Cisco\AnyConnect\NAM\Profiles for script configurations, or locate the NAM profile XML files in the installation directory (commonly in C:\ProgramData\Cisco\Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client\NAM\).Affected if Any pre-logon or pre-authentication scripts are configured in NAM.
-
Verify script execution contextReview the configured NAM scripts to confirm they are set to execute before user logon. Check the script configuration files or registry entries for 'PreLogon' or 'PreAuth' execution flags.Affected if Scripts are configured with pre-logon execution enabled and the Cisco AnyConnect version is below 4.10.03104.
A user is affected if Cisco AnyConnect with the NAM module is installed at a version below 4.10.03104 and has pre-logon scripts configured, allowing potential SYSTEM-level privilege escalation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.10.03104
Apply vendor patches when available; restrict local administrative access to prevent attackers from modifying NAM script configurations; audit existing pre-logon script configurations for unauthorized changes.
4.10.03104 or later
- Check the current version of Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client installed on the system via Windows Programs and Features or the Add or Remove Programs dialog
- Download Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client version 4.10.03104 or later from Cisco's official software distribution (either Cisco Software Central or the Cisco AnyConnect Licensing portal)
- Install the updated Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client by running the installer with appropriate administrative privileges
- Verify the installed version matches the target fixed release after installation completes
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-40124 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-40124 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data