SafariWeb browser · Apple

CVE-2012-3608

HIGH · 9.3 CVSS v2.0 Published 2012-07-25
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 5.1.7 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
WebKit, as used in Apple Safari before 6.0, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption and application crash) via a crafted web site, a different vulnerability than other WebKit CVEs listed in APPLE-SA-2012-07-25-1.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Memory corruption vulnerability in WebKit's rendering engine, as used in Apple Safari before version 6.0. Remote attackers can exploit this through maliciously crafted websites to achieve arbitrary code execution or cause a denial of service via memory corruption and application crash.

MitigationUpdate Apple Safari to version 6.0 or later to obtain the patched WebKit component, or use an alternative browser that does not use the affected WebKit version.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
SafariWeb browser
Affected:<= 5.1.7= 1.0= 1.0.0= 1.0.0b1= 1.0.0b2= 1.0.1= 1.0.2= 1.0.3= 1.0b1= 1.1= 1.1.0= 1.1.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
M
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Safari version
    Open Safari, click Safari in the menu bar and select 'About Safari', or run 'safari --version' in Terminal
    Affected if The displayed version is 5.1.7 or lower, or matches any of these: 1.0, 1.0.0, 1.0.0b1, 1.0.0b2, 1.0.1, 1.0.2, 1.0.3, 1.0b1, 1.1, 1.1.0, 1.1.1
  2. Confirm browser uses WebKit
    This check is inherent to Safari - Safari is built on the WebKit rendering engine
    Affected if The browser is Safari (all Safari versions use WebKit)
  3. Check if Safari is used to browse untrusted websites
    Review whether the Safari browser is used to access websites, particularly untrusted or malicious sites
    Affected if The user browses websites using a vulnerable Safari version, allowing remote attackers to exploit the memory corruption flaw via malicious web pages

A user is affected if they run any version of Apple Safari at or below 5.1.7, or any of the specific older versions listed (1.0 through 1.1.1), and use that browser to visit websites.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 5.1.7
Interim mitigation

Update Apple Safari to version 6.0 or later to obtain the patched WebKit component, or use an alternative browser that does not use the affected WebKit version.

Recommended fix High confidence

Safari 6.0

  1. 1. Back up any important bookmarks, passwords, and browsing data from the current Safari installation
  2. 2. Verify the current macOS version by clicking Apple menu > About This Mac (Safari 6.0 requires OS X Mountain Lion 10.8 or later)
  3. 3. If running macOS 10.8 or later, upgrade to Safari 6.0 through Software Update: Click Apple menu > Software Update
  4. 4. If Software Update is not available for Safari 6.0, upgrade the entire macOS system to a version that includes Safari 6.0 or later
  5. 5. After upgrading, verify the Safari version by going to Safari > About Safari (should show 6.0 or higher)
Caveat Safari 6.0 requires OS X Mountain Lion (10.8) or later; older macOS versions cannot run Safari 6.0

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Safari Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing1.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
4.0 hours of engineering $750
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,200.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-3608 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-3608 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data