SafariWeb browser · Apple

CVE-2012-3641

HIGH · 9.3 CVSS v2.0 Published 2012-07-25
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 5.1.7 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
WebKit, as used in Apple Safari before 6.0, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption and application crash) via a crafted web site, a different vulnerability than other WebKit CVEs listed in APPLE-SA-2012-07-25-1.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Memory corruption vulnerability in WebKit rendering engine (used by Safari) allowing remote code execution or DoS via crafted malicious websites. The high CVSS score (9.3) reflects the critical nature of arbitrary code execution capability.

MitigationUpdate Safari to version 6.0 or later to obtain the patched WebKit component, or apply Apple's corresponding security update.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
SafariWeb browser
Affected:<= 5.1.7= 1.0= 1.0.0= 1.0.0b1= 1.0.0b2= 1.0.1= 1.0.2= 1.0.3= 1.0b1= 1.1= 1.1.0= 1.1.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
M
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Safari version
    On macOS, open Safari and go to Safari > About Safari, or run 'safariVersion' in Terminal. On Windows, check Help > About Safari in the installed application.
    Affected if The displayed version is 5.1.7 or lower, or matches any of these: 1.0, 1.0.0, 1.0.0b1, 1.0.0b2, 1.0.1, 1.0.2, 1.0.3, 1.0b1, 1.1, 1.1.0, or 1.1.1
  2. Confirm WebKit is in use
    Verify that the Safari browser (which relies on the WebKit rendering engine) is actively used in the environment. The vulnerability exists in the WebKit component bundled with Safari.
    Affected if Safari with the vulnerable versions listed above is in regular use for web browsing
  3. Check for recent WebKit-based application usage
    Identify any third-party applications that use the WebKit framework on the system, as some may share the affected component version if they bundle WebKit separately from Safari.
    Affected if Third-party WebKit-based browsers share the same vulnerable WebKit library version and are used

If Safari version is 5.1.7 or lower, or matches any of the specific older versions (1.0 through 1.1.1), the environment is vulnerable to this CVE via the WebKit rendering engine.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 5.1.7
Interim mitigation

Update Safari to version 6.0 or later to obtain the patched WebKit component, or apply Apple's corresponding security update.

Recommended fix High confidence

Safari 6.0 or later

  1. Check current Safari version by going to Safari > About Safari
  2. Upgrade to Safari 6.0 or later. For Mac users, this requires Mac OS X Mountain Lion (10.8) or later. For Windows users, Safari 5.1.7 was the final version and Windows users should consider using an alternative browser or the last available Windows Safari version with additional security measures.
Caveat Safari 6.0 requires Mac OS X Mountain Lion (10.8) or later; Windows users cannot upgrade beyond Safari 5.1.7

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Safari Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-3641 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-3641 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data