SafariWeb browser · Apple

CVE-2012-3642

HIGH · 9.3 CVSS v2.0 Published 2012-07-25
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 5.1.7 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
WebKit, as used in Apple Safari before 6.0, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption and application crash) via a crafted web site, a different vulnerability than other WebKit CVEs listed in APPLE-SA-2012-07-25-1.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

WebKit, the rendering engine used by Apple Safari before version 6.0, contains a memory corruption vulnerability that can be triggered by visiting a specially crafted website. This allows remote attackers to either execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the Safari process or cause a denial of service through memory corruption and application crash.

MitigationUpdate Apple Safari to version 6.0 or later to obtain the patched WebKit component. Users should be instructed to avoid untrusted websites until the update is applied.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
SafariWeb browser
Affected:<= 5.1.7= 1.0= 1.0.0= 1.0.0b1= 1.0.0b2= 1.0.1= 1.0.2= 1.0.3= 1.0b1= 1.1= 1.1.0= 1.1.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
M
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check installed Safari version
    On macOS, open Safari and go to Safari > About Safari. On Windows, open Safari and go to Help > About Safari. Note the version number displayed.
    Affected if The installed Safari version is <= 5.1.7 or matches any of these specific affected versions: 1.0, 1.0.0, 1.0.0b1, 1.0.0b2, 1.0.1, 1.0.2, 1.0.3, 1.0b1, 1.1, 1.1.0, 1.1.1. Safari versions 6.0 and later are not affected.
  2. Confirm WebKit is the active rendering engine
    Safari uses WebKit as its default and only rendering engine. This is not a configurable setting that can be changed. The vulnerability exists in the WebKit component bundled with affected Safari versions.
    Affected if The browser is using Safari with its default WebKit rendering engine (which is always the case for standard Safari installations)

You are affected if the installed Safari version is 5.1.7 or earlier, or matches any of the specific older version numbers listed, since those versions contain the vulnerable WebKit component that can be exploited through malicious websites.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 5.1.7
Interim mitigation

Update Apple Safari to version 6.0 or later to obtain the patched WebKit component. Users should be instructed to avoid untrusted websites until the update is applied.

Recommended fix High confidence

Safari 6.0 or later (requires OS X Mountain Lion 10.8 or later)

  1. Open the App Store application on your Mac
  2. Click on the Updates tab to check for available updates
  3. Locate Safari in the list of available updates
  4. Click Update next to Safari to install version 6.0 or later
  5. Alternatively, upgrade to macOS Mountain Lion (10.8) or later which includes Safari 6.0
  6. After installation, verify the Safari version by selecting Safari > About Safari
Caveat Safari 6.0 requires OS X Mountain Lion (10.8) or later; users running older macOS versions cannot upgrade to this fixed version and may need to upgrade macOS first

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Safari Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing1.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
5.0 hours of engineering $890
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,424.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-3642 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-3642 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data