SafariWeb browser · Apple

CVE-2012-3681

HIGH · 9.3 CVSS v2.0 Published 2012-07-25
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 5.1.7 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
WebKit, as used in Apple Safari before 6.0, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption and application crash) via a crafted web site, a different vulnerability than other WebKit CVEs listed in APPLE-SA-2012-07-25-1.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Memory corruption vulnerability in WebKit's rendering engine allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service via a crafted website. The vulnerability affects Safari browsers prior to version 6.0 and enables memory corruption leading to application crashes or code execution.

MitigationUpdate Safari to version 6.0 or later to obtain the patched WebKit component; alternatively, disable JavaScript or avoid untrusted websites until the update can be applied.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
SafariWeb browser
Affected:<= 5.1.7= 1.0= 1.0.0= 1.0.0b1= 1.0.0b2= 1.0.1= 1.0.2= 1.0.3= 1.0b1= 1.1= 1.1.0= 1.1.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
M
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Determine installed Safari version
    Open Safari, click the Safari menu, and select 'About Safari'. Note the version number displayed in the window.
    Affected if The version shown is 5.1.7 or lower, or matches one of these specific versions: 1.0, 1.0.0, 1.0.0b1, 1.0.0b2, 1.0.1, 1.0.2, 1.0.3, 1.0b1, 1.1, 1.1.0, or 1.1.1
  2. Confirm WebKit is the rendering engine
    Safari uses WebKit as its default rendering engine; no configuration change is required. This condition is met by default in any standard Safari installation.
    Affected if Safari is using WebKit as the rendering engine (the default configuration).
  3. Check for recent Safari updates
    Open the App Store on macOS and click the Updates tab, or on Windows go to Safari > Help > Check for Updates.
    Affected if No Safari 6.0 or later update is available or installed, leaving the browser on a vulnerable version.

A user is affected if their Safari installation is version 5.1.7 or lower, or matches any of the listed specific older versions, and is using the default WebKit rendering engine.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 5.1.7
Interim mitigation

Update Safari to version 6.0 or later to obtain the patched WebKit component; alternatively, disable JavaScript or avoid untrusted websites until the update can be applied.

Recommended fix High confidence

Safari 6.0 or later (or latest available version for your OS)

  1. 1. Check the current Safari version by selecting Safari > About Safari
  2. 2. Determine if your operating system supports Safari 6.0 or later (requires OS X 10.7.3 Lion or later)
  3. 3. Upgrade to Safari 6.0 or a later version through Software Update (Apple Menu > Software Update) or by downloading from apple.com/safari
  4. 4. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking Safari > About Safari shows version 6.0 or later
Caveat Safari 6.0 requires OS X 10.7.3 (Lion) or later; systems running older OS versions cannot upgrade and remain vulnerable

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Safari Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-3681 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-3681 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data