Unified Computing SystemHardware / appliance · Cisco

CVE-2012-4079

MEDIUM · 5.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2013-09-26
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The XML API service in the Fabric Interconnect component in Cisco Unified Computing System (UCS) allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (API service outage) via a malformed XML document in a packet, aka Bug ID CSCtg48206.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The XML API service in the Fabric Interconnect component of Cisco Unified Computing System (UCS) is vulnerable to a denial of service condition when processing malformed XML documents. Remote attackers can send specially crafted packets containing malformed XML, causing the API service to become unavailable.

MitigationApply the Cisco patch for bug ID CSCtg48206 to the affected UCS Fabric Interconnect components. If a patch is unavailable, consider network segmentation or firewall rules to limit API access to trusted sources.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Unified Computing SystemHardware / appliance
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Cisco UCS Fabric Interconnect deployment
    Inventory the network for Cisco Unified Computing System Fabric Interconnect devices. Check for device type 'N9K' or 'M' series fabric interconnect switches in the infrastructure.
    Affected if Cisco UCS Fabric Interconnect hardware is present in the environment
  2. Verify XML API service is enabled
    Log into UCS Manager (UCSM) or the Fabric Interconnect CLI. Navigate to the Admin section or check service status. The XML API is typically accessible on ports 80/443 or 8080/8443.
    Affected if The XML API service is configured and running on the Fabric Interconnect
  3. Check network accessibility of XML API
    From an untrusted network segment, attempt to reach the XML API endpoint on the Fabric Interconnect IP address using HTTP/HTTPS. Use a port scanner to verify ports 80, 443, 8080, or 8443 are reachable from outside the management network.
    Affected if The XML API service ports are exposed to untrusted or external networks
  4. Look for service availability issues
    Review system logs, UCS Manager alarms, or management station alerts for XML API service crashes, restarts, or denial of service events. Check for messages indicating malformed XML processing failures.
    Affected if The XML API service has experienced unexpected restarts or unavailability issues

The environment is affected if Cisco UCS Fabric Interconnect with the XML API service is deployed and the service is network-accessible to untrusted sources, since all versions contain the vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the Cisco patch for bug ID CSCtg48206 to the affected UCS Fabric Interconnect components. If a patch is unavailable, consider network segmentation or firewall rules to limit API access to trusted sources.

Fix this in Unified Computing System Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,640
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-4079 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-4079 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data