JetportHardware / appliance · Korenix

CVE-2012-4577

HIGH · 10.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2012-08-21
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The Linux firmware image on (1) Korenix Jetport 5600 series serial-device servers and (2) ORing Industrial DIN-Rail serial-device servers has a hardcoded password of "password" for the root account, which allows remote attackers to obtain administrative access via an SSH session.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Linux firmware on Korenix Jetport 5600 series and ORing Industrial DIN-Rail serial-device servers contains a hardcoded root password 'password', allowing remote attackers to gain full administrative access via SSH without authentication.

MitigationImmediately restrict SSH access through firewall rules or disable SSH if unused; contact vendors for firmware updates that remove hardcoded credentials; if no update available, consider network isolation or device replacement.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
JetportHardware / appliance
Affected:= 5601= 5601f= 5604= 5604i

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the device model
    Log into the device admin interface or check the physical device label to confirm the exact model number is one of: Jetport 5601, 5601f, 5604, or 5604i
    Affected if The device is a Korenix Jetport 5601, 5601f, 5604, or 5604i model
  2. Confirm SSH service is enabled
    Access the device web interface or CLI and navigate to the services or network settings to verify if SSH is turned on
    Affected if SSH service is enabled on the device
  3. Determine SSH network exposure
    Check the device network configuration to see if SSH is bound to all interfaces (0.0.0.0) or an external-facing IP address rather than only localhost or internal LAN
    Affected if SSH is accessible from an untrusted or external network segment
  4. Verify the hardcoded credential exists
    Attempt an SSH connection to the device using root/password as the credentials - if authentication succeeds, the vulnerability is present
    Affected if SSH authentication succeeds with the root/password credential pair

A defender is affected if they operate a Korenix Jetport 5601/5601f/5604/5604i device with SSH enabled and exposed, where the root password 'password' grants access.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Immediately restrict SSH access through firewall rules or disable SSH if unused; contact vendors for firmware updates that remove hardcoded credentials; if no update available, consider network isolation or device replacement.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence
  1. Immediately change the default root password 'password' to a strong, unique password via SSH or the device's web interface
  2. If the device supports it, disable root SSH login and create an admin user with limited privileges
  3. Restrict SSH access to the device by configuring firewall rules or ACLs to allow only trusted IP addresses
  4. Consider network segmentation to isolate the device from untrusted networks
  5. Contact Korenix/ORing vendors directly to inquire about firmware updates that address this hardcoded credential vulnerability
  6. Document the password change and monitor for unauthorized access attempts

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Jetport Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,820
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,912.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-4577 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-4577 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data