CVE-2013-0006
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMicrosoft XML Core Services (aka MSXML) 3.0, 5.0, and 6.0 does not properly parse XML content, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted web page, aka "MSXML Integer Truncation Vulnerability."
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is an integer truncation vulnerability in Microsoft XML Core Services (MSXML) versions 3.0, 5.0, and 6.0 that allows remote code execution. The vulnerability occurs when MSXML improperly parses crafted XML content, enabling attackers to execute arbitrary code via malicious web pages.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.0= 4.0= 6.0= 5.0all versionsall versionsall versionsall versions= r2all versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify MSXML installationCheck for the presence of MSXML DLL files in system directories. Common paths: %SystemRoot%\System32\msxml3.dll, msxml4.dll, msxml5.dll, msxml6.dll. Use PowerShell command: Get-ChildItem -Path $env:SystemRoot\System32 -Filter 'msxml*.dll' | Select-Object Name, VersionInfoAffected if Any MSXML DLL (version 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, or 6.0) is present on the system
-
Determine installed MSXML versionQuery the exact version of each MSXML DLL found. In PowerShell: (Get-Item 'C:\Windows\System32\msxml6.dll').VersionInfo.FileVersion. Check msxml3.dll, msxml4.dll, msxml5.dll, and msxml6.dll individuallyAffected if The installed version is 3.0.x, 4.0.x, 5.0.x, or 6.0.x (all versions within these major releases are affected)
-
Identify applications using MSXMLReview application usage of MSXML parsers. Check registry keys under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Classes\TypeLib\{F5078F18-C551-11D3-89B9-0000F81FE221} for MSXML versions registered, or examine application logs and dependencies for msxml*.dll load eventsAffected if Any application or service that leverages MSXML for XML parsing is present and active
-
Check browser Active Scripting statusIn Internet Explorer, go to Internet Options > Security > Custom Level > Script ActiveX controls marked safe for scripting. For other browsers, check if they use MSXML via COM automation. This vulnerability is exploitable through malicious web pagesAffected if Browser Active Scripting is enabled and the system processes untrusted XML content
-
Verify Windows version and MSXML presenceRun 'winver' or 'systeminfo' to confirm Windows version. Cross-reference with affected list: Windows XP, Vista, 7, 8, Server 2003, 2008, 2008 R2, 2012. Then check if MSXML DLLs exist on that systemAffected if Running any of the listed Windows versions AND MSXML is installed
A system is affected if it runs any Windows version from XP to Server 2012 and has MSXML version 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, or 6.0 installed, especially if browsers or applications process XML content.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply Microsoft's security update for this vulnerability. Additionally, configure browsers to disable active scripting and restrict access to untrusted websites to reduce attack surface.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-0006 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-0006 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data