Simatic Pcs7Application · Siemens

CVE-2013-0675

MEDIUM · 6.1 CVSS v2.0 Published 2013-03-21
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 8.0 or later.
See remediation →
66/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Buffer overflow in CCEServer (aka the central communications component) in Siemens WinCC before 7.2, as used in SIMATIC PCS7 before 8.0 SP1 and other products, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted packet.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Buffer overflow vulnerability in Siemens WinCC's CCEServer (central communications component) allows remote attackers to cause denial of service via crafted packets. The vulnerability affects WinCC versions before 7.2 and SIMATIC PCS7 versions before 8.0 SP1.

MitigationUpgrade Siemens WinCC to version 7.2 or later, and SIMATIC PCS7 to version 8.0 SP1 or later. If immediate patching is not possible, consider network segmentation to limit exposure of the CCEServer component.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Simatic Pcs7Application
Affected:<= 8.0= 7.1
WinccApplication
Affected:<= 7.1= 5.0= 6.0= 7.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Adjacent
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Complete

AV:A/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if Siemens WinCC is installed
    Check for WinCC installation directories (typically C:\Program Files\Siemens\WinCC) or look for WinCC entries in Windows Add/Remove Programs
    Affected if WinCC is installed and the version is 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, or any version up to and including 7.1
  2. Identify if SIMATIC PCS7 is installed
    Check for PCS7 installation directories or look for SIMATIC PCS7 entries in Windows Add/Remove Programs
    Affected if SIMATIC PCS7 is installed and the version is 7.1 or any version up to and including 8.0
  3. Determine the exact version of WinCC
    Locate the WinCC version information in the installation directory, registry (HKLM\SOFTWARE\Siemens\WinCC\Version), or via the 'ccinstallinfo' utility if available
    Affected if The installed version is before 7.2 (versions 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 7.1 are affected)
  4. Determine the exact version of SIMATIC PCS7
    Locate the PCS7 version information in the installation directory or registry (HKLM\SOFTWARE\Siemens\PCS7\Version)
    Affected if The installed version is before 8.0 SP1 (versions 7.1 through 8.0 are affected)
  5. Verify if CCEServer component is present and enabled
    Check for the CCEServer service or executable within the WinCC/PCS7 installation directory (typically named CCEServer.exe or similar), and check if the service is registered and running via Windows Services console
    Affected if The CCEServer component exists and is running (this is the vulnerable component that must be exposed for exploitation)

Your environment is affected if WinCC versions 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, or 7.1 are installed, or if SIMATIC PCS7 versions 7.1 through 8.0 are installed, and the CCEServer component is present and enabled.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 8.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Siemens WinCC to version 7.2 or later, and SIMATIC PCS7 to version 8.0 SP1 or later. If immediate patching is not possible, consider network segmentation to limit exposure of the CCEServer component.

Fix this in Simatic Pcs7 Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing10.0 h
  • Review / QA6.0 h
34.0 hours of engineering $5,940
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,504.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-0675 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-0675 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data