CVE-2013-1103
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCisco Wireless LAN Controller (WLC) devices with software 7.0 before 7.0.220.0, 7.1 before 7.1.91.0, and 7.2 before 7.2.103.0 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (Access Point reload) via crafted SIP packets, aka Bug ID CSCts87659.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a denial of service vulnerability in Cisco Wireless LAN Controller (WLC) devices. Attackers can send specially crafted SIP (Session Initiation Protocol) packets to affected devices, causing associated Access Points to reload and disconnect wireless clients. The vulnerability affects WLC software versions 7.0 before 7.0.220.0, 7.1 before 7.1.91.0, and 7.2 before 7.2.103.0.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.0= 7.0.98.0= 7.1= 7.2= 7.3all versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Cisco WLC modelLog into the WLC CLI or web interface and run 'show inventory' or check the device model in the web interface under Monitor > Controller > SummaryAffected if The device is one of these models: Cisco 2000, 2100, 2500, 4100, 4400, 5500, or 7500 Wireless LAN Controller
-
Check the WLC software versionRun 'show sysinfo' or 'show version' from the CLI, or check in the web interface under Monitor > Controller > SummaryAffected if The running software version is 7.0.x before 7.0.220.0, 7.1.x before 7.1.91.0, or 7.2.x before 7.2.103.0
-
Verify if SIP is enabled on the WLCRun 'show sip' from the CLI, or check in the web interface under Wireless > SIP > SIP Security. Also check 'show run-config' for any sip-related configurationAffected if SIP functionality is enabled or configured on the controller
-
Check for SIP traffic processingMonitor network traffic or check WLC logs for SIP packets. Run 'show client summary' to see if SIP-based phones or devices are connectedAffected if SIP traffic is being processed or SIP-based devices are associated to the wireless network
A user is affected if they are running a Cisco WLC with a vulnerable software version (7.0 before 7.0.220.0, 7.1 before 7.1.91.0, or 7.2 before 7.2.103.0) and have SIP enabled or SIP devices connected.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Cisco WLC software to version 7.0.220.0, 7.1.91.0, 7.2.103.0 or later. As a temporary measure, consider blocking or rate-limiting SIP traffic at network boundaries if the upgrade cannot be immediately applied.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,680.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-1103 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-1103 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data