CVE-2013-1164
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCisco IOS XE 3.4 before 3.4.4S, 3.5, and 3.6 on 1000 series Aggregation Services Routers (ASR) does not properly implement the Cisco Multicast Leaf Recycle Elimination (MLRE) feature, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (card reload) via fragmented IPv6 multicast packets, aka Bug ID CSCtz97563.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe vulnerability exists in the Cisco Multicast Leaf Recycle Elimination (MLRE) feature on ASR 1000 series routers running IOS XE versions 3.4 (prior to 3.4.4S), 3.5, and 3.6. The improper implementation of MLRE allows remote attackers to send specially crafted fragmented IPv6 multicast packets, triggering a denial of service via forced card reload.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.4.0as= 3.4.0s= 3.4.1s= 3.4.2s= 3.4.3s= 3.5.0s= 3.6.0sall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the ASR 1000 series modelRun 'show version' or 'show inventory' to confirm the device is a Cisco ASR 1001, 1002, 1002-X, 1004, 1006, or 1013Affected if The device is any ASR 1000 series model listed in the affected products
-
Check the IOS XE versionRun 'show version' and locate the IOS XE version string (for example, 3.4.0S, 3.5.0S, 3.6.0S)Affected if Version is 3.4.0S through 3.4.3S, 3.5.0S, or 3.6.0S (versions prior to 3.4.4S in the 3.4 train)
-
Verify MLRE feature is enabledRun 'show running-config | include mlre' or check for 'multicast leaf-recycle elimination' under the appropriate interface or global multicast configurationAffected if MLRE feature is configured and active on the device
-
Confirm IPv6 multicast is activeRun 'show ipv6 multicast' or 'show ip mroute vrf * ipv6' to verify IPv6 multicast routing is enabledAffected if IPv6 multicast routing or forwarding is enabled on the device
The device is vulnerable if it is an ASR 1000 series running an affected IOS XE version (3.4.x prior to 3.4.4S, 3.5.x, or 3.6.x) with the MLRE feature enabled and IPv6 multicast traffic processing active.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Cisco IOS XE to version 3.4.4S or later which contains the fix for this vulnerability. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, consider implementing edge filtering or rate-limiting for fragmented IPv6 multicast traffic as a temporary compensating control.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-1164 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-1164 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data