CVE-2013-1183
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedBuffer overflow in the Intelligent Platform Management Interface (IPMI) functionality in the Manager component in Cisco Unified Computing System (UCS) 1.0 and 1.1 before 1.1(1j) and 1.2 before 1.2(1b) allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via malformed data in a UDP packet, aka Bug ID CSCtd32371.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBuffer overflow vulnerability in the IPMI (Intelligent Platform Management Interface) Manager component of Cisco Unified Computing System (UCS) versions 1.0, 1.1, and 1.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via malformed UDP packets. The CVSS 10 score indicates trivial exploitability with no authentication required.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0= 1.0\(2k\)= 1.1= 1.1\(1m\)= 1.2= 1.2\(1\)= 1.2\(1a\)all versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Cisco UCS firmware versionUse the Cisco UCS Manager CLI or GUI to retrieve the firmware version. From the UCS Manager > Equipment tab > Controller > BIOS, or run 'show version' in the UCSM CLI.Affected if The version matches 1.0, 1.0(2k), 1.1, 1.1(1m), 1.2, 1.2(1), or 1.2(1a)
-
Identify Fabric Interconnect modelCheck the physical hardware or UCS Manager inventory for the Fabric Interconnect model number.Affected if The model is a 6120xp, 6140xp, 6248up, or 6296xp Fabric Interconnect (any version)
-
Verify IPMI service statusCheck if the IPMI Manager service is enabled on the UCS firmware. In UCS Manager, navigate to Equipment > IPMI or use the 'ipmi status' command in the UCSM CLI.Affected if IPMI Manager is enabled and running on the device
-
Check IPMI network exposureIdentify if UDP port 623 (standard IPMI port) is open to untrusted networks. Use network scanning tools or review firewall rules and access lists.Affected if UDP port 623 is accessible from networks outside the trusted management segment
-
Confirm management interface configurationReview the management VLAN and IP address configuration for the IPMI interface in UCS Manager under Admin > Communication Management > Communication Services.Affected if The IPMI interface is configured with an IP address on a shared or production network rather than an isolated management network
You are affected if your Cisco UCS runs firmware version 1.0 through 1.2(1a), or uses a 6120xp/6140xp/6248up/6296up Fabric Interconnect, and the IPMI service is enabled and reachable via UDP port 623.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Cisco UCS firmware to version 1.1(1j), 1.2(1b), or later. If patching is not immediately feasible, disable or restrict access to the IPMI interface via network segmentation and firewall rules.
1.1(1j) or later for 1.0.x/1.1.x branches; 1.2(1b) or later for 1.2.x branch
- 1. Identify the current Cisco UCS version by logging into Cisco UCS Manager and checking the version under the General tab or using 'show version' command
- 2. For UCS versions 1.0.x or 1.1.x: Plan upgrade to version 1.1(1j) or later
- 3. For UCS version 1.2.x: Plan upgrade to version 1.2(1b) or later
- 4. Download the appropriate firmware bundle from Cisco.com (requires valid Cisco service contract)
- 5. Backup UCS configuration before initiating upgrade
- 6. Schedule maintenance window as upgrades require downtime
- 7. Follow Cisco UCS upgrade procedure using Cisco UCS Manager or CLI - typically involves uploading firmware to firmware repository and then installing via 'scope firmware' and 'firmware install' commands
- 8. Verify upgrade completed successfully and system is running fixed version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-1183 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-1183 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data