CVE-2013-1184
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe management API in the XML API management service in the Manager component in Cisco Unified Computing System (UCS) 1.x before 1.2(1b) allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (service outage) via a malformed request, aka Bug ID CSCtg48206.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe vulnerability exists in the XML API management service within the Cisco UCS Manager component. Remote attackers can send malformed requests to the management API, causing a denial of service that results in a service outage. This affects Cisco UCS Manager versions 1.x prior to version 1.2(1b).
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0= 1.0\(2k\)= 1.1= 1.1\(1m\)= 1.2= 1.2\(1\)= 1.2\(1a\)all versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Cisco UCS Manager versionAccess the UCS Manager CLI or GUI and run 'show version' or check the firmware version in the UCS Manager interface. The version is displayed as 1.x or 1.x(y)Affected if Version is 1.0, 1.0(2k), 1.1, 1.1(1m), 1.2, 1.2(1), or 1.2(1a) - versions prior to 1.2(1b)
-
Identify the Fabric Interconnect modelCheck the hardware model number on the physical device or via UCS Manager inventory: 'show inventory' in UCS CLIAffected if Model is 6120xp, 6140xp, 6248up, or 6296up Fabric Interconnect (all versions are affected)
-
Identify the Integrated Management ControllerCheck if the system uses Cisco IMC (Integrated Management Controller) - verify via 'show server health' or check the management interface IP accessAffected if System uses Integrated Management Controller (all versions affected)
-
Verify the XML API service is accessibleTest connectivity to port 443/80 on the UCS Manager management IP address using a tool like curl or by checking if the XML API endpoint respondsAffected if The XML API management service is exposed and reachable on the network
Your environment is affected if you run Cisco UCS Manager version 1.x prior to 1.2(1b), or use any version of the 6120xp/6140xp/6248up/6296up Fabric Interconnect or Integrated Management Controller with the XML API service accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Cisco UCS Manager to version 1.2(1b) or later to remediate this vulnerability. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, consider network segmentation to limit exposure of the management interface to untrusted networks.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-1184 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-1184 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data