CVE-2013-1653
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedPuppet before 2.6.18, 2.7.x before 2.7.21, and 3.1.x before 3.1.1, and Puppet Enterprise before 1.2.7 and 2.7.x before 2.7.2, when listening for incoming connections is enabled and allowing access to the "run" REST endpoint is allowed, allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via a crafted HTTP request.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidencePuppet contains a remote code execution vulnerability in its REST API. When the listen option is enabled and the 'run' REST endpoint is accessible, remote authenticated users can send crafted HTTP requests to execute arbitrary code on the Puppet master. This stems from insufficient validation of input passed through the 'run' endpoint.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 11.10= 12.04= 12.10>= 2.6.0, <= 2.6.17= 2.7.2= 2.7.3= 2.7.4= 2.7.5= 2.7.6= 2.7.7= 2.7.8= 2.7.9= 2.7.10= 2.7.11= 2.7.12= 2.7.0= 2.7.1= 2.7.19= 2.7.20= 1.0= 1.1= 1.2.0= 1.2.1= 1.2.2= 1.2.3= 1.2.4= 1.2.5= 3.1.0= 2.7.0= 2.7.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Authentication
- Single
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Puppet versionRun `puppet --version` on the Puppet master or examine the installed package version using the system package manager (e.g., `dpkg -l puppet` on Ubuntu, `rpm -qa puppet` on RHEL).Affected if The installed version falls within: Puppet 2.6.0 to 2.6.17; 2.7.0 to 2.7.12 (specific versions: 2.7.0, 2.7.1, 2.7.2, 2.7.3, 2.7.4, 2.7.5, 2.7.6, 2.7.7, 2.7.8, 2.7.9, 2.7.10, 2.7.11, 2.7.12); Puppetlabs Puppet 1.0, 1.1, 1.2.0-1.2.5, 2.7.19, 2.7.20; or Puppet Enterprise 2.7.0, 2.7.1, 3.1.0.
-
Verify the listen option is enabled in puppet.confLocate the puppet.conf configuration file (typically at /etc/puppet/puppet.conf or /etc/puppet.conf) and search for the `[master]` section. Check if `listen = true` is present under that section.Affected if The listen option is set to true in the [master] section of puppet.conf.
-
Confirm the run REST endpoint is accessibleCheck if the Puppet master is configured to accept incoming connections on the run endpoint port (default 8139). Review the puppet.conf for any `masterport` or `listen` settings, and verify the firewall/iptables rules allow incoming connections to port 8139. Also examine the auth.conf file (at /etc/puppet/auth.conf) to see if the run endpoint path (/run) is defined and accessible.Affected if Port 8139 is open/accessible and the run endpoint is not explicitly denied in auth.conf.
-
Check for unauthenticated or authenticated access rules to the run endpointExamine the /etc/puppet/auth.conf file and look for rules matching the path /run. Determine if access control allows authenticated remote users to invoke the run endpoint.Affected if The auth.conf permits authenticated remote users to access the /run endpoint without sufficient validation.
A system is affected by CVE-2013-1653 if it runs a vulnerable Puppet version AND has listen=true enabled AND exposes the run REST endpoint to authenticated remote users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Puppet to version 2.6.18+, 2.7.21+, 3.1.1+ (or Puppet Enterprise 1.2.7+/2.7.2+), or disable the 'run' REST endpoint and/or disable incoming connections if upgrading is not immediately feasible.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-1653 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-1653 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data