CVE-2013-1768
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe BrokerFactory functionality in Apache OpenJPA 1.x before 1.2.3 and 2.x before 2.2.2 creates local executable JSP files containing logging trace data produced during deserialization of certain crafted OpenJPA objects, which makes it easier for remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by creating a serialized object and leveraging improperly secured server programs.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceApache OpenJPA BrokerFactory deserializes crafted OpenJPA objects and writes logging trace data to local executable JSP files, enabling remote attackers to achieve arbitrary code execution through the created JSP shells. The vulnerability stems from unsafe deserialization combined with predictable file placement in web-accessible directories.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0.0= 1.0.1= 1.0.2= 1.0.3= 1.0.4= 1.1.0= 1.2.0= 1.2.1= 1.2.2= 2.0.0= 2.0.1= 2.1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Apache OpenJPA versionLocate the openjpa jar file in your application classpath or WEB-INF/lib directory and determine its version. Check your build configuration (Maven pom.xml, Gradle build.gradle) for the openjpa dependency version, or use 'jar -xf' to inspect the manifest file inside the openjpa jar.Affected if The installed version is 1.0.0, 1.0.1, 1.0.2, 1.0.3, 1.0.4, 1.1.0, 1.2.0, 1.2.1, 1.2.2, 2.0.0, 2.0.1, or 2.1.0
-
Verify BrokerFactory deserialization is in useSearch your application code for usage of org.apache.openjpa.BrokerFactory or look for persistence.xml files that specify 'org.apache.openjpa.persistence.PersistenceProviderImpl' as the JPA provider. Check if your application accepts OpenJPA serialized objects from external sources.Affected if Your application uses OpenJPA BrokerFactory and accepts deserialized objects from untrusted input sources
-
Inspect logging configuration for web-accessible pathsReview your logging configuration files (log4j.xml, log4j.properties, logback.xml) or OpenJPA-specific trace settings. Identify the directory where OpenJPA trace or logging output is written. Check if this directory is within the web application root or otherwise web-accessible.Affected if OpenJPA logging or trace output is configured to write to a directory that is accessible via HTTP (such as the webapp root or static content directories)
-
Confirm network exposure of vulnerable endpointsReview your application network endpoints and interfaces. Determine if there are any HTTP endpoints, RMI services, or other network interfaces that accept and deserialize OpenJPA objects from remote clients without authentication or validation.Affected if The application exposes network-accessible endpoints that accept untrusted serialized objects without input validation
You are affected if you run any of the listed OpenJPA versions AND your application deserializes OpenJPA objects from untrusted sources AND writes OpenJPA logs to a web-accessible directory.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Apache OpenJPA to version 1.2.3 or later (1.x) or 2.2.2 or later (2.x). Additionally, restrict network access to vulnerable endpoints and implement deserialization allowlists to prevent untrusted object injection.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,680.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-1768 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- archives.neohapsis.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- svn.apache.org
- svn.apache.org
- svn.apache.org
- svn.apache.org
- svn.apache.org
- svn.apache.org
- svn.apache.org
- svn.apache.org
- www-01.ibm.com
- www-01.ibm.com
- www-01.ibm.com
- www-01.ibm.com
- www-01.ibm.com
- www-01.ibm.com
- www.oracle.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-1768 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data