CVE-2013-2430
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) component in Oracle Java SE 7 Update 17 and earlier, 6 Update 43 and earlier, and 5.0 Update 41 and earlier; JavaFX 2.2.7 and earlier; and OpenJDK 6 and 7 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors related to ImageIO. NOTE: the previous information is from the April 2013 CPU. Oracle has not commented on claims from another vendor that this issue is related to "JPEGImageReader state corruption" when using native code.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCVE-2013-2430 is a vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment's ImageIO component, specifically involving JPEGImageReader state corruption when processing images using native code. The unspecified vulnerability in ImageIO allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability, likely through memory corruption that could enable arbitrary code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.7.0= 1.7.0<= 1.6.0= 1.6.0<= 1.5.0= 1.5.0<= 1.7.0= 1.7.0<= 1.6.0= 1.6.0<= 1.5.0= 1.5.0= 1.6.0= 1.5.0= 1.6.0= 1.5.0<= 2.2.7= 2.0= 2.0.2= 2.0.3= 2.1= 2.2= 2.2.3= 2.2.4= 2.2.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Java versionRun 'java -version' or 'java -fullversion' from command line to display the installed JRE/JDK versionAffected if Version is 1.7.0 or earlier, 1.6.0 or earlier, or 1.5.0 (any update release within these major versions)
-
Determine Java vendor and product typeRun 'java -version' and check if the output shows Oracle, Sun, or OpenJDK. Also check if JavaFX is installed by looking for javafx*.jar in the Java lib directory or running 'java -version' for JavaFX-specific entriesAffected if Product is Oracle JRE/JDK, Sun JRE/JDK, or Oracle JavaFX within the affected version ranges
-
Verify ImageIO component availabilityCheck that the jre/lib/rt.jar (or equivalent in newer Java) contains the ImageIO classes. In Java, run: java -verbose:class 2>&1 | grep -i imageio to confirm ImageIO classes are loadableAffected if ImageIO component is present (standard in all affected Java installations)
-
Check for applications using ImageIOReview deployed Java applications for usage of javax.imageio package, specifically code using JPEGImageReader class to process JPEG imagesAffected if Any Java application or applet uses ImageIO to process JPEG images
Your environment is affected if you run any Oracle or Sun JRE/JDK version 1.5.x, 1.6.x, or 1.7.x (or JavaFX 2.x through 2.2.7) that processes JPEG images via the ImageIO component.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the April 2013 Critical Patch Update from Oracle, which includes the fix for this vulnerability (upgrade to JDK/JRE 7u21, 6u45, or 5u45 or later; OpenJDK 6b18+ or 7b21+). If immediate patching is not feasible, disable Java browser plugins and restrict Java Web Start execution.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,992.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-2430 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- www.oracle.com
- blog.fuseyism.com
- blog.fuseyism.com
- h20000.www2.hp.com
- hg.openjdk.java.net
- lists.apple.com
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- mail.openjdk.java.net
- marc.info
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- security.gentoo.org
- www.mandriva.com
- www.mandriva.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- www.us-cert.gov
- bugzilla.redhat.com
- oval.cisecurity.org
- oval.cisecurity.org
- oval.cisecurity.org
- wiki.mageia.org
- wiki.mageia.org
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-2430 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data