Rational Policy TesterApplication · Ibm

CVE-2013-4062

MEDIUM · 6.8 CVSS v2.0 Published 2013-09-09
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
77/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
IBM Rational Policy Tester 8.5 before 8.5.0.5 does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof Jazz Team servers, obtain sensitive information, and modify the client-server data stream via a crafted certificate.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

IBM Rational Policy Tester 8.5 before 8.5.0.5 fails to verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, allowing the application to accept any certificate presented by a server without validation. This enables man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof Jazz Team servers, intercept sensitive information, and modify client-server communications by presenting crafted fraudulent certificates.

MitigationUpgrade to IBM Rational Policy Tester version 8.5.0.5 or later which implements proper X.509 certificate chain validation for SSL connections.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Rational Policy TesterApplication
Affected:= 8.5.0.0= 8.5.0.1= 8.5.0.2= 8.5.0.3= 8.5.0.4

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
M
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate IBM Rational Policy Tester installation
    Check common installation paths such as C:\Program Files\IBM\Rational Policy Tester or /opt/IBM/RationalPolicyTester, or look for the process 'RationalPolicyTester.exe' running on the system
    Affected if IBM Rational Policy Tester is installed on the system
  2. Determine installed version
    Check the version information in the installation directory, such as a version.txt file, or right-click the executable and view Properties > Details, or check Add/Remove Programs for the installed version
    Affected if Version is 8.5.0.0, 8.5.0.1, 8.5.0.2, 8.5.0.3, or 8.5.0.4
  3. Identify SSL connection usage to Jazz Team servers
    Review application configuration files or connection settings that specify SSL/TLS-enabled endpoints to Jazz Team servers, typically found in the configuration directory under SSL or server connection settings
    Affected if The application is configured to use SSL/TLS connections to connect to Jazz Team servers
  4. Confirm vulnerability condition
    No specific configuration check required - the certificate validation flaw is inherent to the affected versions (8.5.0.0-8.5.0.4). The application accepts any SSL certificate presented by a server without validation.
    Affected if Running any affected version (8.5.0.0-8.5.0.4) and using SSL connections to Jazz Team servers

You are affected if IBM Rational Policy Tester version 8.5.0.0 through 8.5.0.4 is installed and configured to make SSL connections to Jazz Team servers, as the application will accept any certificate without validation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to IBM Rational Policy Tester version 8.5.0.5 or later which implements proper X.509 certificate chain validation for SSL connections.

Fix this in Rational Policy Tester Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-4062 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-4062 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data