CVE-2013-4496
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSamba 3.x before 3.6.23, 4.0.x before 4.0.16, and 4.1.x before 4.1.6 does not enforce the password-guessing protection mechanism for all interfaces, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain access via brute-force ChangePasswordUser2 (1) SAMR or (2) RAP attempts.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSamba versions 3.x before 3.6.23, 4.0.x before 4.0.16, and 4.1.x before 4.1.6 fail to enforce password-guessing protection on all interfaces, specifically the SAMR (Security Account Manager Remote) and RAP (Remote Administration Protocol) interfaces used for ChangePasswordUser2 operations. This allows remote attackers to conduct brute-force attacks against these password change mechanisms.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 10.04= 12.04= 12.10= 13.10>= 3.4.0, < 3.6.23>= 4.0.0, < 4.0.16>= 4.1.0, < 4.1.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Samba versionRun 'smbd --version' or 'samba --version' to determine the installed Samba versionAffected if The version is less than 3.6.23 for 3.x, less than 4.0.16 for 4.0.x, or less than 4.1.6 for 4.1.x series
-
Verify SAMR interface is exposedCheck if TCP ports 139 or 445 are listening and accessible from untrusted networks. Use 'netstat -tlnp | grep -E "(139|445)"' or 'ss -tlnp | grep -E "(139|445)"' to identify listening servicesAffected if SMB ports are open to untrusted networks and Samba version is in the affected range
-
Confirm RAP password change functionality is availableTest if the SAMR and RAP ChangePasswordUser2 operations are reachable. This can be attempted using 'smbclient' or 'net rpc' commands if available, or by examining smb.conf for 'rpc server' settingsAffected if Password change via SAMR/RAP is accessible and Samba version is affected
You are affected if running a Samba version in the affected range (3.4.0 to 3.6.22, 4.0.0 to 4.0.15, or 4.1.0 to 4.1.5) AND the SAMR/RAP interfaces are exposed on the network
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data3.6.234.0.164.1.6
Upgrade Samba to version 3.6.23, 4.0.16, 4.1.6 or later. Additionally, restrict network access to SAMR and RAP interfaces using firewalls or disable these protocols if not required.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-4496 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- www.samba.org
- www.samba.org
- www.samba.org
- www.samba.org
- bugzilla.samba.org
- advisories.mageia.org
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- rhn.redhat.com
- security.gentoo.org
- www.mandriva.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- h20566.www2.hpe.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-4496 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data