RobohelpApplication · Adobe

CVE-2013-5327

HIGH · 10.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2013-10-09
Patch available
A vendor patch is available. No clean upgrade release — apply the published patch.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click Patch available

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
MDBMS.dll in Adobe RoboHelp 10 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via unspecified vectors.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · low confidence

Memory corruption vulnerability in MDBMS.dll in Adobe RoboHelp 10 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause denial of service via unspecified vectors. The vulnerability stems from improper memory handling in the affected DLL, leading to potential code execution or service disruption.

MitigationApply available Adobe patches for RoboHelp 10 or upgrade to a supported version. If patches are unavailable, consider restricting access to the affected component or disabling RoboHelp until remediation is possible.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
RobohelpApplication
Affected:= 10.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate Adobe RoboHelp 10 installation directory
    Check common installation paths such as C:\Program Files\Adobe\Adobe RoboHelp 10 or C:\Program Files (x86)\Adobe\Adobe RoboHelp 10. Use Windows File Explorer or command 'dir /s /b C:\*RoboHelp* 2>nul' to search for the folder.
    Affected if The Adobe RoboHelp 10 folder exists on the system, indicating version 10.0 is installed.
  2. Verify presence of vulnerable MDBMS.dll
    Navigate to the RoboHelp 10 installation folder and locate MDBMS.dll. Common path pattern: <InstallDir>\RoboHelp\Bin\MDBMS.dll or similar subdirectory. Use 'dir MDBMS.dll /s /b' within the installation folder.
    Affected if MDBMS.dll file exists in the RoboHelp 10 directory structure.
  3. Confirm RoboHelp 10.0 exact version
    Right-click on the main RoboHelp executable (robohelp.exe) or the MDBMS.dll file, select Properties, then view the Details tab to verify the exact version. The affected version is specifically 10.0.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 10.0 (not 9.x, 10.1, or later).

A system is affected if Adobe RoboHelp version 10.0 is installed and the vulnerable MDBMS.dll file is present in the installation directory.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Patch available Apply the vendor patch
Vendor patch www.adobe.com →
Interim mitigation

Apply available Adobe patches for RoboHelp 10 or upgrade to a supported version. If patches are unavailable, consider restricting access to the affected component or disabling RoboHelp until remediation is possible.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

Adobe RoboHelp 11 or later (check APSB13-24 for specific fixed version)

  1. Navigate to the Adobe security bulletin at http://www.adobe.com/support/security/bulletins/apsb13-24.html
  2. Locate the entry for Adobe RoboHelp 10
  3. Download and apply the specific hotfix/patch provided by Adobe for this vulnerability
  4. Verify the patch was applied successfully by checking the RoboHelp version or rebuilding your project

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Robohelp Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get the patch applied

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-5327 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-5327 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data