CVE-2017-3104
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe RoboHelp has a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability. This affects versions before RH12.0.4.460 and RH2017 before RH2017.0.2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAdobe RoboHelp versions before RH12.0.4.460 and RH2017 before RH2017.0.2 contain a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could allow attackers to inject malicious scripts through the application.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2017.0.1< 12.0.4.460CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Adobe RoboHelp installationCheck for Adobe RoboHelp in the Windows Start Menu, or look in Control Panel > Programs and Features for an entry named 'Adobe RoboHelp'Affected if Adobe RoboHelp is listed as an installed program
-
Locate the installed version numberIn Programs and Features, find the Adobe RoboHelp entry and note the version number shown (typically in the 'Version' column); alternatively, launch RoboHelp and go to Help > About Adobe RoboHelp to view the exact versionAffected if Version displayed is below 12.0.4.460 for the RH12.x product line, or below 2017.0.2 for the RH2017 product line
-
Identify the product version familyDetermine whether the installation is the RH12.x legacy version or the RH2017 version by examining the version number format - RH12.x versions start with 12, while RH2017 versions start with 2017Affected if The version family is either RH12.x or RH2017 and falls below the safe version thresholds
You are affected if Adobe RoboHelp is installed and the version is either 2017.x below 2017.0.2, or 12.x below 12.0.4.460.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data12.0.4.4602017.0.1
Update Adobe RoboHelp to version RH12.0.4.460 or RH2017.0.2 or later to remediate this vulnerability.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-3104 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-3104 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data