CVE-2013-5475
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCisco IOS 12.2 through 12.4 and 15.0 through 15.3, and IOS XE 2.1 through 3.9, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via crafted DHCP packets that are processed locally by a (1) server or (2) relay agent, aka Bug ID CSCug31561.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCisco IOS 12.2-12.4 and 15.0-15.3, along with IOS XE 2.1-3.9, contains a denial of service vulnerability in the DHCP server and relay agent processing code. Remote attackers can send specially crafted DHCP packets to the device, which when processed locally cause an unexpected reload of the device.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.1.0= 2.1.1= 2.1.2= 2.2.1= 2.2.2= 2.2.3= 2.3.0= 2.3.1= 2.3.1t= 2.3.2= 2.4.0= 2.4.1= 12.2= 12.3= 12.4= 15.0= 15.1= 15.2= 15.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Cisco IOS/IOS XE versionRun 'show version' or 'show version | include Version' command on the device CLIAffected if The displayed version falls within 12.2, 12.3, 12.4, 15.0, 15.1, 15.2, 15.3 for IOS, or 2.1.x through 3.9.x for IOS XE
-
Determine if DHCP server is enabledRun 'show ip dhcp server' or check configuration with 'show run | include dhcp'Affected if DHCP server configuration appears in the running configuration (ip dhcp pool, ip dhcp excluded-address, etc.)
-
Determine if DHCP relay agent is enabledRun 'show run | include ip helper-address' or check interface configurations for helper addressesAffected if Any interface has 'ip helper-address' configured, which enables DHCP relay agent functionality
-
Check for recent unexpected reloadsRun 'show logging | include reload' or 'show version' to view last reload reasonAffected if There are unexplained reloads or the reload reason indicates a watchdog timeout or crash without a known cause
A device is affected if it runs a vulnerable IOS/IOS XE version AND has either the DHCP server or DHCP relay agent (ip helper-address) feature enabled, as either feature processes DHCP packets that could trigger the vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to a patched Cisco IOS/IOS XE version per Cisco's advisory. As an interim measure, restrict DHCP traffic at network boundaries using ACLs to prevent unauthenticated DHCP packets from reaching affected devices.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-5475 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-5475 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data