CVE-2013-6245
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnspecified vulnerability in SAP Sybase Adaptive Server Enterprise (ASE) before 15.0.3 ESD#4.3. 15.5 before 15.5 ESD#5.3, and 15.7 before 15.7 SP50 or 15.7 SP100 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSAP Sybase Adaptive Server Enterprise (ASE) contains an unspecified vulnerability allowing remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code. The vulnerability affects multiple version branches (15.0.x, 15.5.x, and 15.7.x) prior to specific ESD/SP milestones. This is a critical remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability with CVSS 10, requiring authentication but allowing complete system compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Sybase ASE installation and versionRun the SQL command 'select @@version' against the ASE instance, or check the installation directory for version files such as $SYBASE/ASE-15_0/install/VERSION, $SYBASE/ASE-15_5/install/VERSION, or $SYBASE/ASE-15_7/install/VERSION depending on the installed branch.Affected if The displayed version falls within 15.0.x before ESD#4.3, 15.5.x before ESD#5.3, or 15.7.x before SP100.
-
Confirm the exact ESD or SP levelExecute 'select @@spid, @ @version, @@ase_version' or check the output of 'sp_version' stored procedure. Also inspect any patch README files in the installation directory to identify the exact ESD or Service Pack level applied.Affected if The installed ESD level is earlier than #4.3 for version 15.0, earlier than #5.3 for version 15.5, or earlier than SP100 for version 15.7.
-
Assess network exposure of the ASE listenerReview the ASE network configuration using 'sp_listener' or check the interfaces file ($SYBASE/interfaces) to determine which network interfaces and ports the ASE listener is bound to, then verify whether these ports are accessible from untrusted networks.Affected if The ASE listener port is exposed to network segments accessible by untrusted or anonymous users, allowing remote authentication attempts.
-
Verify authentication controls and account exposureQuery the ASE user accounts table (such as master.dbo.syslogins) or use 'sp_displaylogin' to enumerate valid login accounts. Check for any default, test, or weakly secured accounts that could be leveraged by an attacker.Affected if Multiple database accounts exist with credentials that may be guessable or known to external authenticated users.
You are affected if your installed Sybase ASE version is 15.0.x before ESD#4.3, 15.5.x before ESD#5.3, or 15.7.x before SP100, AND the server is accessible to remote authenticated users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade SAP Sybase ASE to version 15.0.3 ESD#4.3 or later, 15.5 ESD#5.3 or later, or 15.7 SP100 or later. Since the attack vector is unspecified, prioritize patching all accessible ASE instances and ensure network segmentation limits exposure to authenticated users.
15.0.3 ESD#4.3+, 15.5 ESD#5.3+, or 15.7 SP50/SP100+ (depending on your branch)
- 1. Identify current SAP Sybase ASE version by running 'select @@version' or using 'sp_version'
- 2. Determine which version branch you are on (15.0.3, 15.5, or 15.7)
- 3. If on 15.0.3 branch: upgrade to 15.0.3 ESD#4.3 or later
- 4. If on 15.5 branch: upgrade to 15.5 ESD#5.3 or later
- 5. If on 15.7 branch: upgrade to 15.7 SP50 or 15.7 SP100 or later
- 6. Perform full database backup before applying upgrade
- 7. Apply the upgrade following SAP installation/upgrade documentation
- 8. After upgrade, verify version with 'select @@version' to confirm fix is applied
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation12.0 h
- Implementation20.0 h
- Testing16.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $15,744.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-6245 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-6245 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data