CVE-2014-0241
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedrubygem-hammer_cli_foreman: File /etc/hammer/cli.modules.d/foreman.yml world readable
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe rubygem-hammer_cli_foreman package stores configuration in /etc/hammer/cli.modules.d/foreman.yml with world-readable permissions (0644), allowing any local user on the system to read potentially sensitive configuration data.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 6.0all versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the foreman.yml configuration fileCheck if the file /etc/hammer/cli.modules.d/foreman.yml exists on the system using: ls -la /etc/hammer/cli.modules.d/foreman.ymlAffected if The file does not exist (not vulnerable because there is no configuration to read)
-
Inspect file permissions on foreman.ymlRun: stat -c '%a' /etc/hammer/cli.modules.d/foreman.yml to get the octal permission bitsAffected if The permission bits are 0644 or otherwise allow world read access (e.g., 0644, 0647, 0655)
-
Verify world-readable statusRun: ls -l /etc/hammer/cli.modules.d/foreman.yml and check if the 'others' column shows 'r--' or 'r-x' permissionsAffected if The file shows read permission for 'others' or 'world' (last three characters are 'r--' or similar)
-
Confirm hammer_cli_foreman package is installedRun: rpm -q rubygem-hammer_cli_foreman or check via your package manager if the package is presentAffected if The package is installed AND the config file has world-readable permissions
A user is affected if the /etc/hammer/cli.modules.d/foreman.yml file exists with 0644 or equivalent world-readable permissions, allowing any local user to read potentially sensitive configuration data.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataChange the file permissions on /etc/hammer/cli.modules.d/foreman.yml to restrict read access (e.g., chmod 600 or chmod 640) and verify the hammer CLI tool functions correctly after the change.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,200.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-0241 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-0241 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data