Telepresence Tc SoftwareApplication · Cisco

CVE-2014-2166

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v2.0 Published 2014-05-02
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
87/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The SIP implementation in Cisco TelePresence TC Software 4.x and TE Software 4.x allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via crafted SIP packets, aka Bug ID CSCto70562.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The SIP implementation in Cisco TelePresence TC Software 4.x and TE Software 4.x contains a vulnerability where specially crafted SIP packets sent to the device cause a denial of service via forced device reload. This is a remote, unauthenticated network-based attack targeting the SIP protocol handler.

MitigationApply the Cisco patch for this vulnerability (refer to Cisco bug ID CSCto70562). If patching is delayed, implement network segmentation to restrict SIP traffic to trusted sources and reduce attack surface.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Telepresence Tc SoftwareApplication
Affected:= 4.0.0= 4.0.1= 4.0.4= 4.1.1= 4.1.2= 4.2.0= 4.2.1= 4.2.2= 4.2.3= 4.2.4
Telepresence Te SoftwareApplication
Affected:= 4.1.0= 4.1.1= 4.1.2= 4.1.3

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed Cisco TelePresence software version
    Access the device via its web interface or API and locate the software version information, typically found in the system status or diagnostics section. Alternatively, use the device's command-line interface and query the current software version.
    Affected if The installed version matches one of the following: TC Software 4.0.0, 4.0.1, 4.0.4, 4.1.1, 4.1.2, 4.2.0, 4.2.1, 4.2.2, 4.2.3, 4.2.4; or TE Software 4.1.0, 4.1.1, 4.1.2, 4.1.3
  2. Determine if SIP protocol handling is enabled
    Access the device configuration and locate the SIP settings. Check whether the SIP feature or profile is activated on the device. This is typically found in the device's network or protocol configuration settings.
    Affected if SIP is enabled or configured on the device, as the vulnerability resides in the SIP implementation and requires SIP to be active for the attack to trigger the reload.
  3. Assess network exposure of the SIP service
    Review the device's network configuration and firewall rules to determine if the SIP port (typically UDP/TCP 5060) is accessible from untrusted or external network segments. Verify whether the device accepts SIP packets from unauthenticated or unknown sources.
    Affected if The SIP service is reachable from untrusted network sources or the device is directly exposed to the network without restrictive access controls, enabling remote unauthenticated attackers to send malicious SIP packets.

The device is affected if it runs any of the listed TC or TE software versions AND has SIP enabled AND is accessible to remote attackers on the network.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the Cisco patch for this vulnerability (refer to Cisco bug ID CSCto70562). If patching is delayed, implement network segmentation to restrict SIP traffic to trusted sources and reduce attack surface.

Fix this in Telepresence Tc Software Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,800
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,880.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-2166 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-2166 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data