CVE-2014-2523
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditednet/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_dccp.c in the Linux kernel through 3.13.6 uses a DCCP header pointer incorrectly, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (system crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a DCCP packet that triggers a call to the (1) dccp_new, (2) dccp_packet, or (3) dccp_error function.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe DCCP connection tracking module in the Linux kernel (net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_dccp.c) incorrectly uses a DCCP header pointer, allowing a remote attacker to cause memory corruption via specially crafted DCCP packets. This affects the dccp_new, dccp_packet, and dccp_error functions, potentially enabling arbitrary code execution or kernel panic.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 3.2.57>= 3.3, < 3.4.86>= 3.5, < 3.10.36>= 3.11, < 3.12.17>= 3.13.0, < 3.13.9= 10.04CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check the running kernel versionRun 'uname -r' or 'cat /proc/version' to get the kernel version, then compare against the affected ranges: < 3.2.57, >= 3.3 and < 3.4.86, >= 3.5 and < 3.10.36, >= 3.11 and < 3.12.17, >= 3.13.0 and < 3.13.9Affected if The kernel version falls within any of the listed vulnerable ranges
-
Verify if the DCCP kernel module is loadedRun 'lsmod | grep dccp' or check /proc/modules for any loaded dccp-related modulesAffected if The dccp module or nf_conntrack_proto_dccp module is loaded in memory
-
Check if DCCP protocol support is compiled into the kernelCheck for /sys/module/dccp* or look for CONFIG_IP_DCCP in /boot/config-$(uname -r) or /proc/config.gz if availableAffected if DCCP support is enabled in the kernel configuration (CONFIG_IP_DCCP or CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_DCCP is set to y or m)
-
Check for active DCCP connections or socketsRun 'ss -d' or check /proc/net/dccp* to list any DCCP sockets or connections in useAffected if There are active DCCP connections or the system is accepting DCCP traffic
The system is affected if the kernel version is in the vulnerable ranges AND DCCP protocol support is enabled or loaded in the kernel.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped3.2.573.4.863.10.36
Apply the upstream kernel patch or upgrade to a patched kernel version. As an immediate workaround, disable DCCP protocol support in the kernel or block DCCP traffic at network borders.
Linux kernel 3.2.57, 3.4.86, 3.10.36, or 3.12.17 (depending on your current branch); or latest stable kernel 3.13+
- 1. Identify the currently running kernel version using 'uname -r'
- 2. Determine which version branch your current kernel belongs to (e.g., 3.2.x, 3.4.x, 3.10.x, 3.12.x)
- 3. For 3.0-3.2.x kernels: upgrade to kernel version 3.2.57 or later
- 4. For 3.3-3.4.x kernels: upgrade to kernel version 3.4.86 or later
- 5. For 3.5-3.10.x kernels: upgrade to kernel version 3.10.36 or later
- 6. For 3.11-3.12.x kernels: upgrade to kernel version 3.12.17 or later
- 7. For 3.13+ kernels: verify the fix is included by checking the changelog or upgrading to the latest stable kernel
- 8. For Ubuntu 10.04: this distribution reached end-of-life in April 2013; no official kernel patches are available; migration to a supported Ubuntu release is strongly recommended
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,864.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-2523 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-2523 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data