CVE-2014-3153
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe futex_requeue function in kernel/futex.c in the Linux kernel through 3.14.5 does not ensure that calls have two different futex addresses, which allows local users to gain privileges via a crafted FUTEX_REQUEUE command that facilitates unsafe waiter modification.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA race condition in the futex_requeue function in Linux kernel versions through 3.14.5 allows local users to gain elevated privileges by submitting a crafted FUTEX_REQUEUE command that fails to validate that source and destination futex addresses are different, enabling unsafe waiter manipulation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 3.2.60>= 3.3, < 3.4.92>= 3.5, < 3.10.42>= 3.11, < 3.12.22>= 3.13, < 3.14.6= 6.2= 12.04= 14.04= 5= 6= 11.4= 11= 11= 11CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the running kernel versionExecute 'uname -r' or 'cat /proc/version' to retrieve the currently running kernel versionAffected if The kernel version is within any of these vulnerable ranges: < 3.2.60; >= 3.3 and < 3.4.92; >= 3.5 and < 3.10.42; >= 3.11 and < 3.12.22; >= 3.13 and < 3.14.6
-
Confirm the vulnerability is locally exploitableVerify local user access exists on the system. This flaw requires a local attacker to execute crafted FUTEX_REQUEUE commandsAffected if The system allows local user access and runs a kernel version matching the affected ranges above
-
Check for futex system call usageReview application behavior or audit logs for FUTEX_REQUEUE operations if available. This is a kernel-level flaw in the futex_requeue implementation rather than a configurable featureAffected if The system runs a vulnerable kernel version; the flaw exists in the kernel code itself regardless of specific futex usage patterns
A system is affected if it runs any Linux kernel version within the ranges listed in step 1, as the race condition in futex_requeue is present in the kernel code itself.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped3.2.603.4.923.10.42
Apply the upstream kernel patch or upgrade to a kernel version beyond 3.14.5 that contains the fix for the futex address validation.
Kernel 3.2.60 or later (for 3.2.x), 3.4.92 or later (for 3.4.x), 3.10.42 or later (for 3.10.x), 3.12.22 or later (for 3.12.x), or 3.14.5+ (upstream stable)
- Identify the current kernel version using 'uname -r'
- Download or obtain the appropriate fixed kernel package for your distribution
- For RHEL/CentOS/Oracle Linux: run 'yum update kernel' or 'dnf update kernel'
- For Ubuntu: run 'apt-get update && apt-get install linux-image-<version>'
- For SUSE: run 'zypper update kernel-default'
- Reboot the system to load the updated kernel using 'shutdown -r now' or 'reboot'
- Verify the new kernel version is running with 'uname -r'
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-3153 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- git.kernel.org
- www.debian.org
- git.kernel.org
- git.kernel.org
- git.kernel.org
- github.com
- linux.oracle.com
- linux.oracle.com
- linux.oracle.com
- linux.oracle.com
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- rhn.redhat.com
- www.exploit-db.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securitytracker.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- bugzilla.redhat.com
- github.com
- www.debian.org
- elongl.github.io
- openwall.com
- openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- git.kernel.org
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- www.cisa.gov
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-3153 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data