CVE-2014-4752
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM System Networking G8052, G8124, G8124-E, G8124-ER, G8264, G8316, and G8264-T switches before 7.9.10.0; EN4093, EN4093R, CN4093, SI4093, EN2092, and G8264CS switches before 7.8.6.0; Flex System Interconnect Fabric before 7.8.6.0; 1G L2-7 SLB switch for Bladecenter before 21.0.21.0; 10G VFSM for Bladecenter before 7.8.14.0; 1:10G switch for Bladecenter before 7.4.8.0; 1G switch for Bladecenter before 5.3.5.0; Server Connectivity Module before 1.1.3.4; System Networking RackSwitch G8332 before 7.7.17.0; and System Networking RackSwitch G8000 before 7.1.7.0 have hardcoded credentials, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain access via unspecified vectors.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMultiple IBM System Networking switch models contain hardcoded credentials (embedded usernames and passwords in firmware) that allow remote attackers to bypass authentication and gain full administrative access to affected devices. The vulnerability affects various RackSwitch, Flex System, BladeCenter, and System Networking switch models across different firmware branches.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 7.7.16.0<= 7.1.6.0all versions<= 5.3.4.0all versions<= 7.9.1.0<= 7.9.1.0<= 7.9.1.0<= 7.9.1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the switch modelLog into the switch CLI and run 'show system' or 'show version' to display the product name and model numberAffected if The model is any of: RackSwitch G8332, BladeCenter 1G, RackSwitch G8052, RackSwitch G8124, RackSwitch G8124e, or RackSwitch G8124er
-
Retrieve the firmware versionRun 'show version' or 'show firmware' in the switch CLI to display the installed firmware versionAffected if The firmware version cannot be determined or is not displayed
-
Check if G8332 is affectedCompare the installed firmware version against the affected ranges: versions <= 7.7.16.0 or <= 7.1.6.0, or any version if not branch-specificAffected if The installed version is 7.7.16.0 or lower, or 7.1.6.0 or lower, or is an all-versions G8332 unit
-
Check if BladeCenter 1G is affectedCompare the installed firmware version against the affected range: <= 5.3.4.0Affected if The installed version is 5.3.4.0 or lower, or is an all-versions BladeCenter 1G unit
-
Check if G8052, G8124, G8124e, or G8124er are affectedCompare the installed firmware version against the affected range: <= 7.9.1.0Affected if The installed version is 7.9.1.0 or lower for any of these four models
The environment is affected if the switch model is any of the listed RackSwitch or BladeCenter models AND the installed firmware version falls within or below the specified version thresholds, or if it is an all-versions variant.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor-supplied firmware updates to patched versions (7.9.10.0, 7.8.6.0, or later depending on model). If immediate patching is not possible, isolate affected switches behind strict network segmentation, disable unnecessary remote management access, and implement additional authentication layers such as RADIUS or TACACS+ for management access.
Upgrade to firmware version 7.9.10.0 or later for G8052/G8124 series; 7.8.6.0 or later for EN4093/EN2092 series; 7.7.17.0 or later for G8332; 7.1.7.0 or later for G8000; 5.3.5.0 or later for 1G Bladecenter switches; 21.0.21.0 or later for 1G L2-7 SLB (specific to each product model)
- 1. Identify the specific switch model from the affected product list (G8052, G8124, G8124-E, G8124-ER, G8264, G8316, G8264-T, EN4093, EN4093R, CN4093, SI4093, EN2092, G8264CS, Flex System Interconnect Fabric, 1G L2-7 SLB, 10G VFSM, 1:10G, 1G switch for Bladecenter, Server Connectivity Module, G8332, or G8000)
- 2. Determine the current firmware version by accessing the switch management interface or using CLI command 'show version'
- 3. Download the appropriate fixed firmware version from IBM support website based on your switch model: For G8052/G8124 series: upgrade to 7.9.10.0 or later; For EN4093/EN2092 series: upgrade to 7.8.6.0 or later; For G8332: upgrade to 7.7.17.0 or later; For G8000: upgrade to 7.1.7.0 or later; For 1G Bladecenter switches: upgrade to 5.3.5.0 or later; For 1G L2-7 SLB: upgrade to 21.0.21.0 or later
- 4. Backup current switch configuration using 'upload config' or management interface
- 5. Upload and install the new firmware via TFTP, FTP, or management interface using 'firmware upload' or equivalent command
- 6. Verify firmware installation success with 'show version'
- 7. Reboot the switch if required by the firmware update process
- 8. After reboot, verify the new firmware version is installed and test network connectivity
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-4752 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-4752 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data