EshopApplication · Oxid Esales

CVE-2014-4919

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2018-01-19
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 4.7.13 / 4.8.7 or later.
See remediation →
61/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
OXID eShop Professional Edition before 4.7.13 and 4.8.x before 4.8.7, Enterprise Edition before 5.0.13 and 5.1.x before 5.1.7, and Community Edition before 4.7.13 and 4.8.x before 4.8.7 allow remote attackers to assign users to arbitrary dynamical user groups.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

OXID eShop before versions 4.7.13/4.8.7 and 5.0.13/5.1.7 contains a broken access control vulnerability in the dynamical user group assignment functionality. Remote attackers can exploit missing authorization checks to assign arbitrary users to any dynamical user group, enabling privilege escalation within the application.

MitigationUpgrade OXID eShop to the patched versions (4.7.13/4.8.7 for Professional/Community Edition, 5.0.13/5.1.7 for Enterprise Edition) or later. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict access to user group management interfaces via web server configuration or access control lists.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
EshopApplication
Affected:< 4.7.13>= 4.8.0, < 4.8.7< 5.0.13>= 5.1.0, < 5.1.7

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Determine installed OXID eShop version
    Locate the version file in the OXID installation directory (commonly version.php in the core directory or check the admin panel footer for the version number)
    Affected if The installed version falls within < 4.7.13, >= 4.8.0 and < 4.8.7, < 5.0.13, or >= 5.1.0 and < 5.1.7
  2. Identify dynamical user group functionality
    Log into the OXID admin panel and navigate to User Management > User Groups. Look for any user groups configured with dynamic assignment rules (criteria-based automatic membership)
    Affected if Dynamical user groups exist in the system and the application handles user-group assignments through this feature
  3. Verify authorization on group assignment requests
    Examine the HTTP requests and application code responsible for adding users to dynamical user groups. Confirm whether the application validates user permissions before allowing a user to be assigned to a group
    Affected if The group assignment endpoint accepts requests without validating that the requester has administrative privileges to modify group memberships
  4. Check for unexpected group assignments
    Review the database tables storing user-group relationships (typically oxobject2group or similar) for any user-to-group mappings that were not created by an administrator through proper admin channels
    Affected if Users are found assigned to dynamical groups without corresponding admin audit trails or authorization logs

You are affected if your installed OXID eShop version is within the vulnerable ranges AND the dynamical user group assignment feature is in use, with no external access controls restricting the vulnerable endpoint.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 4.7.13 / 4.8.7 / 5.0.13 or later
Fixed in 4.7.134.8.75.0.13
Interim mitigation

Upgrade OXID eShop to the patched versions (4.7.13/4.8.7 for Professional/Community Edition, 5.0.13/5.1.7 for Enterprise Edition) or later. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict access to user group management interfaces via web server configuration or access control lists.

Fix this in Eshop Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,640
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-4919 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-4919 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data