CVE-2014-7989
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCisco Unified Computing System on B-Series blade servers allows local users to gain shell privileges via a crafted (1) ping6 or (2) traceroute6 command, aka Bug ID CSCuq38176.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceLocal privilege escalation vulnerability in Cisco Unified Computing System (UCS) B-Series blade servers allows authenticated local users to gain shell privileges by executing specially crafted ping6 or traceroute6 commands. The vulnerability stems from improper input validation in these network diagnostic utilities, enabling command injection and elevation from limited user access to full shell access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- Single
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Cisco UCS blade modelAccess the Cisco UCS Manager or check the physical server label/metadata to determine the exact model number of the B-Series blade serverAffected if The model is one of: B200 M3, B200 M4, B22 M3, B230 M2, B260 M4, B420 M3, B440 M2, or B460 M4
-
Confirm the device is a Cisco UCS B-Series bladeVerify the system is a Cisco Unified Computing System B-Series blade server and not a C-Series (rack server) or other platformAffected if The system is a Cisco UCS B-Series blade server
-
Check for local authenticated user accountsReview user accounts configured in Cisco UCS Manager with local authentication (not LDAP/AD) - these users would have shell access privilegesAffected if Local user accounts exist in UCS Manager with shell access permissions
-
Verify network diagnostic utilities are accessibleConfirm that ping6 and traceroute6 commands are available to authenticated local users on the blade's service profile or CIMC interfaceAffected if Authenticated local users can execute ping6 or traceroute6 network utilities
If the system is any version of a Cisco UCS B-Series blade server (B200 M3, B200 M4, B22 M3, B230 M2, B260 M4, B420 M3, B440 M2, or B460 M4) with local user accounts that can access network diagnostic tools, the environment is affected by this vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the relevant Cisco UCS firmware update for B-Series blades that addresses CSCuq38176. Restrict local user access and monitor for unauthorized shell access until patching is complete.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-7989 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-7989 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data