CVE-2014-8159
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe InfiniBand (IB) implementation in the Linux kernel package before 2.6.32-504.12.2 on Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 6 does not properly restrict use of User Verbs for registration of memory regions, which allows local users to access arbitrary physical memory locations, and consequently cause a denial of service (system crash) or gain privileges, by leveraging permissions on a uverbs device under /dev/infiniband/.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe InfiniBand (IB) implementation in RHEL 6 kernels before 2.6.32-504.12.2 lacks proper restrictions on User Verbs for memory region registration, allowing local users with access to /dev/infiniband/ uverbs devices to read/write arbitrary physical memory locations, leading to potential privilege escalation or denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2.6.12, < 3.2.69>= 3.3, < 3.4.108>= 3.5, < 3.10.75>= 3.11, < 3.12.41>= 3.13, < 3.14.39>= 3.15, < 3.16.35>= 3.17, < 3.18.13>= 3.19, < 3.19.5= 10.04= 12.04= 14.04= 14.10= 7.0= 8.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:L/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check kernel versionRun 'uname -r' or 'cat /proc/version' to get the running kernel versionAffected if The kernel version falls within any of these ranges: >= 2.6.12 and < 3.2.69; >= 3.3 and < 3.4.108; >= 3.5 and < 3.10.75; >= 3.11 and < 3.12.41; >= 3.13 and < 3.14.39; >= 3.15 and < 3.16.35; >= 3.17 and < 3.18.13; >= 3.19 and < 3.19.5
-
Verify InfiniBand uverbs devices existList contents of /dev/infiniband/ directory using 'ls -la /dev/infiniband/'Affected if Any files matching 'uverbs*' exist in /dev/infiniband/ (for example, /dev/infiniband/uverbs0)
-
Check permissions on uverbs devicesRun 'ls -la /dev/infiniband/uverbs*' to view owner, group, and world read/write permissionsAffected if The device files are readable and writable by non-root users (world-readable/writable or owned by a group the untrusted user belongs to)
-
Identify users with uverbs accessRun 'getent group | grep infiniband' and check /dev/infiniband/ device group membership, or use 'stat /dev/infiniband/uverbs*' to see group ownershipAffected if Untrusted local users have read/write access to uverbs devices through group membership or world permissions
You are affected if your kernel version is within the affected ranges AND untrusted local users can access /dev/infiniband/ uverbs devices with read/write permissions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data3.2.693.4.1083.10.75
Apply the kernel update (2.6.32-504.12.2 or later) and restrict access to /dev/infiniband/ uverbs devices to trusted local users only.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-8159 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- kb.juniper.net
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- www.debian.org
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securitytracker.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- bugzilla.redhat.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-8159 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data