Prime Network Control SystemApplication · Cisco

CVE-2015-0768

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v2.0 Published 2015-06-12
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The Device Work Center (DWC) component in Cisco Prime Network Control System (NCS) 2.1(0.0.85), 2.2(0.0.58), and 2.2(0.0.69) does not properly implement AAA roles, which allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended access restrictions and execute commands via a login session, aka Bug ID CSCur27371.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Device Work Center (DWC) component in Cisco Prime Network Control System versions 2.1(0.0.85), 2.2(0.0.58), and 2.2(0.0.69) contains a role-based access control (RBAC) bypass vulnerability where AAA role enforcement is not properly implemented. Authenticated users can bypass intended access restrictions and execute privileged commands through the DWC component by manipulating their login session, despite being assigned to roles that should not permit such access.

MitigationApply the relevant Cisco patch for this vulnerability (refer to Cisco bug ID CSCur27371). If no patch is available, verify and restrict AAA role assignments to ensure users only have permissions appropriate to their job function, and consider network segmentation to limit exposure of the NCS management interface.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Prime Network Control SystemApplication
Affected:= 2.1\(0.0.85\)= 2.2\(0.0.58\)= 2.2\(0.0.69\)

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
Single
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Cisco Prime NCS version
    Log into the NCS admin interface and navigate to the About or System Information page, or run 'show version' command via CLI if accessible
    Affected if The installed version matches exactly 2.1(0.0.85), 2.2(0.0.58), or 2.2(0.0.69)
  2. Verify Device Work Center component accessibility
    Attempt to access the DWC component interface via the NCS web UI, typically found under the Device Work Center menu or equivalent administrative section
    Affected if DWC component is accessible and functional in the environment
  3. Review AAA role assignments for users
    Use the NCS administrative interface to list all users and their assigned AAA roles. Check for users assigned to roles that should have restricted command execution permissions
    Affected if Users with limited roles have access to privileged commands they should not possess, indicating the RBAC bypass is present
  4. Inspect user session tokens and role enforcement
    Examine the session management logs or use browser developer tools to inspect session cookies/tokens when accessing DWC. Compare actual permissions granted versus what the assigned role should permit
    Affected if Session role claims do not match the user's assigned AAA role, or privileged commands execute despite restricted role assignment

Your environment is affected if you are running exactly version 2.1(0.0.85), 2.2(0.0.58), or 2.2(0.0.69) of Cisco Prime Network Control System and users can execute privileged commands through the Device Work Center that their assigned AAA roles should not permit.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the relevant Cisco patch for this vulnerability (refer to Cisco bug ID CSCur27371). If no patch is available, verify and restrict AAA role assignments to ensure users only have permissions appropriate to their job function, and consider network segmentation to limit exposure of the NCS management interface.

Fix this in Prime Network Control System Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
20.0 hours of engineering $3,500
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-0768 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-0768 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data