CVE-2015-1448
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe integrated management service on Siemens Ruggedcom WIN51xx devices with firmware before SS4.4.4624.35, WIN52xx devices with firmware before SS4.4.4624.35, WIN70xx devices with firmware before BS4.4.4621.32, and WIN72xx devices with firmware before BS4.4.4621.32 allows remote attackers to bypass authentication and perform administrative actions via unspecified vectors.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe integrated management service on Siemens Ruggedcom WIN51xx, WIN52xx, WIN70xx, and WIN72xx wireless devices contains an authentication bypass vulnerability allowing remote unauthenticated attackers to gain administrative access via unspecified vectors in the management interface.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= bs4.4.4621.31<= ss4.4.4624.34CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Ruggedcom WIN device modelAccess the device CLI or web interface and record the exact model number (WIN51xx, WIN52xx, WIN70xx, or WIN72xx)Affected if Model is any of WIN51xx, WIN52xx, WIN70xx, or WIN72xx
-
Determine installed firmware versionIn the device CLI, run 'show version' or access the web interface System > Firmware/Software section to retrieve the current firmware build numberAffected if Firmware version is unknown or cannot be retrieved for comparison
-
Compare firmware to affected version rangesFor WIN51xx/WIN52xx: compare your SS (service stable) version against <= ss4.4.4624.34. For WIN70xx/WIN72xx: compare your BS (base stable) version against <= bs4.4.4621.31Affected if Firmware version is ss4.4.4624.34 or lower for WIN51xx/WIN52xx, OR bs4.4.4621.31 or lower for WIN70xx/WIN72xx
-
Verify management interface accessibilityCheck if the device web-based management interface (HTTP/HTTPS on port 80/443 or custom management ports) is reachable from network segments outside the trusted administrative zoneAffected if Management interface is exposed to untrusted networks or the internet
Device is affected if it is a WIN51xx/WIN52xx device running firmware ss4.4.4624.34 or lower, OR a WIN70xx/WIN72xx device running firmware bs4.4.4621.31 or lower, AND the management interface is network-accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade firmware to SS4.4.4624.35 or later for WIN51xx/WIN52xx devices, and BS4.4.4621.32 or later for WIN70xx/WIN72xx devices. If immediate patching is not feasible, restrict network access to the management interface using firewall rules or VLAN isolation.
SS4.4.4624.35 (for WIN51xx/WIN52xx) or BS4.4.4621.32 (for WIN70xx/WIN72xx)
- Identify the exact Ruggedcom WIN device model (WIN51xx, WIN52xx, WIN70xx, or WIN72xx) from the affected installation
- Locate the current firmware version on the device through the management interface or device label
- For WIN51xx and WIN52xx devices: Upgrade firmware to version SS4.4.4624.35 or later
- For WIN70xx and WIN72xx devices: Upgrade firmware to version BS4.4.4621.32 or later
- Obtain the firmware upgrade file from the official Siemens support portal at www.siemens.com/ruggedcom
- Follow the standard Ruggedcom firmware upgrade procedure: upload the firmware file through the web-based management interface or CLI, then reboot the device
- After upgrade, verify the firmware version and confirm the management service is functioning correctly
- Verify that the authentication bypass vulnerability is resolved by attempting to access administrative functions without credentials
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-1448 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-1448 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data