CVE-2015-1449
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedBuffer overflow in the integrated web server on Siemens Ruggedcom WIN51xx devices with firmware before SS4.4.4624.35, WIN52xx devices with firmware before SS4.4.4624.35, WIN70xx devices with firmware before BS4.4.4621.32, and WIN72xx devices with firmware before BS4.4.4621.32 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBuffer overflow vulnerability in the integrated web server of Siemens Ruggedcom WIN wireless devices (WIN51xx, WIN52xx, WIN70xx, WIN72xx) allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code due to insufficient bounds checking in the web server component.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= bs4.4.4621.31<= ss4.4.4624.34CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Ruggedcom WIN device modelAccess the device CLI or web interface and retrieve the hardware model identifier. Look for WIN51xx, WIN52xx, WIN70xx, or WIN72xx in the system information or device label.Affected if The device model is any of WIN51xx, WIN52xx, WIN70xx, or WIN72xx.
-
Check the firmware versionVia CLI, run 'show version' or access the web interface and navigate to the system status or firmware information page. Record the BS or SS firmware version number.Affected if The firmware version is BS4.4.4621.31 or lower, OR SS4.4.4624.34 or lower.
-
Verify the integrated web server is enabledAccess the device configuration via CLI or web interface and check the web server settings. Look for HTTP/HTTPS server configuration under the web server or HTTP service settings.Affected if The integrated web server (HTTP or HTTPS) is enabled and listening on any interface.
-
Assess network exposure of the web interfaceCheck the network configuration to determine if the web server is bound to any externally accessible IP address, or if firewall rules permit unrestricted access to ports 80/443 from untrusted networks.Affected if The web interface is accessible from untrusted or external network segments without firewall filtering.
A device is affected if it is a WIN51xx, WIN52xx, WIN70xx, or WIN72xx model running firmware BS4.4.4621.31 or lower, or SS4.4.4624.34 or lower, with the integrated web server enabled and accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate firmware to SS4.4.4624.35 or later for WIN51xx/WIN52xx, and BS4.4.4621.32 or later for WIN70xx/WIN72xx. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict network access to the web interface using firewall rules or network segmentation.
Upgrade to SS4.4.4624.35 for WIN51xx/WIN52xx devices, or BS4.4.4621.32 for WIN70xx/WIN72xx devices
- Identify the specific Ruggedcom WIN device model (WIN51xx, WIN52xx, WIN70xx, or WIN72xx)
- Access the device's web interface or console to determine the current firmware version
- Review Siemens Ruggedcom firmware upgrade documentation for the device
- Download the appropriate firmware version: SS4.4.4624.35 for WIN51xx/WIN52xx, or BS4.4.4621.32 for WIN70xx/WIN72xx
- Back up the current device configuration before upgrading
- Upload and install the new firmware via the device's web management interface or command line interface
- After upgrade, verify the firmware version matches the fixed release and confirm the web server is operational
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-1449 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-1449 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data