CVE-2015-1931
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM Java Security Components in IBM SDK, Java Technology Edition 8 before SR1 FP10, 7 R1 before SR3 FP10, 7 before SR9 FP10, 6 R1 before SR8 FP7, 6 before SR16 FP7, and 5.0 before SR16 FP13 stores plaintext information in memory dumps, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading a file.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIBM Java Security Components in IBM SDK Java Technology Edition stores plaintext sensitive information (possibly credentials/passwords) in memory dump files. Local users with access to these dump files can read them to obtain the sensitive data in plaintext form.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 5.6= 5.7= 5.0= 6.0= 7.0= 6.7= 7.1= 7.2= 7.3= 7.4= 7.5= 5.0= 6.0= 7.0= 5.0= 6.0= 7.0>= 5.0.0.0, < 5.0.16.13>= 6.0.0.0, < 6.0.16.7>= 6.1.0.0, < 6.1.8.7>= 7.0.0.0, < 7.0.9.10>= 7.1.0.0, < 7.1.3.10>= 8.0.0.0, < 8.0.1.10= 11= 11CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed IBM Java SDK versionRun 'java -version' or check installed packages (rpm -qa | grep -i ibm-java or dpkg -l | grep -i ibm-java) to determine the exact IBM Java version installedAffected if The installed IBM Java version falls within one of the affected ranges: 5.0.0.0 to <5.0.16.13, 6.0.0.0 to <6.0.16.7, 6.1.0.0 to <6.1.8.7, 7.0.0.0 to <7.0.9.10, 7.1.0.0 to <7.1.3.10, or 8.0.0.0 to <8.0.1.10
-
Locate memory dump files on the systemSearch for common dump file types: heap dumps (.hprof), javacore files (javacore.*.txt), core dumps (core.*), and snap traces (*.snap) in directories such as /var/crash/, /var/tmp/, application working directories, and /tmp/Affected if Any memory dump files exist on the system that were generated by IBM Java processes
-
Verify dump file ownership and permissionsList dump files with 'ls -la' and check if they are readable by non-privileged users or users other than the application ownerAffected if Dump files are readable by users other than the application owner or by all users on the system
-
Check for IBM Java processes with dump-generating configurationsInspect running Java processes using 'ps aux | grep java' and review any JVM options that enable dump generation (such as -XX:+HeapDumpOnOutOfMemoryError or -Xdump options)Affected if IBM Java processes are running with dump-generating options enabled and those dumps could contain sensitive data
The environment is affected if IBM Java SDK versions within the affected ranges are installed AND memory dump files exist on the system that could be accessed by local users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.0.16.136.0.16.76.1.8.7
Update IBM JDK to the fixed versions (Java 8 SR1 FP10+, 7 R1 SR3 FP10+, 7 SR9 FP10+, 6 R1 SR8 FP7+, 6 SR16 FP7+, 5.0 SR16 FP13+) or migrate to a supported Java version. Restrict access to memory dump files.
IBM Java SDK 5.0 SR16 FP13, 6.0 SR16 FP7, 6.1 SR8 FP7, 7.0 SR9 FP10, 7.1 SR3 FP10, or 8 SR1 FP10 or later
- 1. Identify the current IBM Java SDK version installed by running: java -version
- 2. For Java 5.0: upgrade to version 5.0.16.13 or later
- 3. For Java 6.0: upgrade to version 6.0.16.7 or later
- 4. For Java 6.1: upgrade to version 6.1.8.7 or later
- 5. For Java 7.0: upgrade to version 7.0.9.10 or later
- 6. For Java 7 R1: upgrade to version 7.1.3.10 or later
- 7. For Java 8: upgrade to version 8.0.1.10 or later (SR1 FP10)
- 8. Download the appropriate IBM Java SDK fix from IBM Fix Central (https://www-945.ibm.com/support/fixcentral/)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-1931 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-1931 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data