CVE-2015-2342
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe JMX RMI service in VMware vCenter Server 5.0 before u3e, 5.1 before u3b, 5.5 before u3, and 6.0 before u1 does not restrict registration of MBeans, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via the RMI protocol.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe JMX RMI service in VMware vCenter Server versions 5.0 before u3e, 5.1 before u3b, 5.5 before u3, and 6.0 before u1 lacks proper restrictions on MBean registration. This allows unauthenticated remote attackers to register arbitrary MBeans via the RMI protocol, leading to remote code execution with system privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 5.0= 5.1= 5.5= 6.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed vCenter Server versionLog into the vSphere Web Client or vSphere Client and navigate to the About page (Help > About) to view the version number, or check the installed software programs on the vCenter Server system.Affected if The version is 5.0, 5.1, 5.5, or 6.0 without the corresponding update patch (u3e for 5.0, u3b for 5.1, u3 for 5.5, u1 for 6.0). Compare your version against these fixed updates.
-
Verify JMX RMI service statusAccess the Managed Object Browser (MOB) at https://<vcenter-host>/mob and navigate to ServiceInstance > content > serviceManagement > managedObjectReferences to look for JMX RMI related MBeans, or check the vCenter Server services via the vSphere Client (Host > Actions > Services > Manage Services).Affected if The JMX RMI service is running or enabled. If the service is stopped or disabled, the attack surface may be reduced.
-
Check for exposed RMI portsRun a network port scan or use netstat on the vCenter Server to identify open ports in the RMI/JMX range (typically port 1099 and dynamic RMI ports), and verify whether these ports are accessible from untrusted networks.Affected if Port 1099 (RMI Registry) or other JMX RMI ports are listening and reachable from untrusted network segments.
You are affected if your vCenter Server version is 5.0, 5.1, 5.5, or 6.0 without the respective update patch AND the JMX RMI service is enabled and accessible on the network.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor-supplied updates (u3e for 5.0, u3b for 5.1, u3 for 5.5, u1 for 6.0) to patch the JMX RMI service. If patching is not immediately feasible, consider disabling the JMX RMI service or restricting network access to the RMI port.
vCenter Server 5.0 Update 3e, 5.1 Update 3b, 5.5 Update 3, or 6.0 Update 1 (or migrate to a currently supported version)
- 1. Back up the vCenter Server configuration and database before starting the upgrade.
- 2. Review the VMSA-2015-0007 advisory at http://www.vmware.com/security/advisories/VMSA-2015-0007.html for detailed upgrade instructions.
- 3. Download the appropriate patched update from VMware's download portal: vCenter Server 5.0 Update 3e, 5.1 Update 3b, 5.5 Update 3, or 6.0 Update 1.
- 4. Apply the update by following VMware's standard vCenter Server update/upgrade procedures.
- 5. Verify the JMX RMI service is running correctly after the upgrade.
- 6. Confirm the vulnerability is remediated by reviewing the vCenter Server version and build number.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-2342 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-2342 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data