CVE-2015-4238
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe SNMP implementation in Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software 8.4(7) and 8.6(1.2) allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (device reload) by sending many SNMP requests during a time of high network traffic, aka Bug ID CSCul02601.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA denial of service vulnerability exists in the SNMP implementation of Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software versions 8.4(7) and 8.6(1.2). Remote authenticated users can trigger a device reload by sending numerous SNMP requests during periods of high network traffic, causing the ASA to crash and restart.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 8.4\(7\)= 8.6\(1.2\)CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- Single
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check ASA software versionRun 'show version' on the ASA CLI to identify the installed software versionAffected if The version displayed is 8.4(7) or 8.6(1.2)
-
Verify SNMP is enabledRun 'show snmp-server' or 'show run snmp-server' to check if SNMP is configured and activeAffected if SNMP server is enabled and running on the device
-
Check SNMP access configurationRun 'show snmp-server group' and 'show snmp-server user' to see which SNMP users or communities have access and from which hostsAffected if SNMP users or community strings are configured with remote access (any host or non-loopback addresses)
-
Identify SNMP interface bindingRun 'show snmp-server engineid' and check 'show run | include snmp-server' for interface bindingsAffected if SNMP is bound to any interface other than the loopback or management-only interface, indicating potential external exposure
-
Review SNMP access control listsCheck for 'snmp-server access-list' entries or interface ACLs that may permit or restrict SNMP trafficAffected if SNMP traffic is permitted from untrusted networks or there are no ACLs restricting SNMP access
The device is affected if it runs ASA version 8.4(7) or 8.6(1.2) and has SNMP enabled with remote authenticated access exposed to untrusted networks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Cisco ASA Software to a version beyond 8.4(7) and 8.6(1.2) that addresses this vulnerability. If immediate patching is not feasible, restrict SNMP access to trusted management networks and limit the number of authenticated SNMP users.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-4238 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-4238 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data