CVE-2015-4554
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple unspecified vulnerabilities in TIBCO Spotfire Client and Spotfire Web Player Client in Spotfire Analyst before 5.5.2, 6.0.x before 6.0.3, 6.5.x before 6.5.3, and 7.0.x before 7.0.1; Spotfire Analytics Platform for AWS 6.5 and 7.0.x before 7.0.1; Spotfire Automation Services before 5.5.2, 6.0.x before 6.0.3, 6.5.x before 6.5.3, and 7.0.x before 7.0.1; Spotfire Deployment Kit before 5.5.2, 6.0.x before 6.0.3, 6.5.x before 6.5.3, and 7.0.x before 7.0.1; Spotfire Desktop before 6.5.2 and 7.0.x before 7.0.1; Spotfire Desktop Language Packs 7.0.x before 7.0.1; Spotfire Professional before 5.5.2, 6.0.x before 6.0.3, 6.5.x before 6.5.3, and 7.0.x before 7.0.1; Spotfire Web Player before 5.5.2, 6.0.x before 6.0.3, 6.5.x before 6.5.3, and 7.0.x before 7.0.1; and Silver Fabric Enabler for Spotfire Web Player before 2.1.1 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or obtain sensitive information via unknown vectors.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMultiple unspecified vulnerabilities in TIBCO Spotfire products (Client, Web Player, Analytics Platform, Automation Services, Deployment Kit, Desktop, Professional) allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or obtain sensitive information via unknown vectors. The affected versions span multiple release branches (5.x, 6.x, 7.x) before specific patch levels.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 5.5.1= 6.0.0= 6.0.1= 6.0.2= 6.5.0= 6.5.1= 6.5.2= 7.0.0<= 5.5.1= 6.0.0= 6.0.1= 6.0.2= 6.5.0= 6.5.1= 6.5.2= 7.0.0<= 5.5.1= 6.0.0= 6.0.1= 6.0.2= 6.5.0= 6.5.1= 6.5.2= 7.0.0<= 6.5.1= 7.0.0= 7.0.0<= 5.5.1= 6.0.0= 6.0.1= 6.0.2= 6.5.0= 6.5.1= 6.5.2= 7.0.0<= 5.5.1= 6.0.0= 6.0.1= 6.0.2= 6.5.0= 6.5.1= 6.5.2= 7.0.0= 2.1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed TIBCO Spotfire productLocate the Spotfire installation directory or check Programs and Features (Windows) or installed packages (Linux). Common installation paths: C:\Program Files\TIBCO\spotfire\ or /opt/tibco/spotfire/Affected if The product name matches one of: Deployment Kit, Professional, Web Player, Desktop, Automation Services, Analyst, or Silver Fabric Enabler For Spotfire Webplayer
-
Determine the product version numberCheck the version file in the installation directory, or run 'spotfire --version' if available, or right-click the executable and view Properties > Details for the File VersionAffected if Version number is readable and falls within 5.x, 6.x, or 7.x release branches
-
Compare installed version against affected version listMatch your installed product and version against the affected list: Deployment Kit <= 5.5.1 or = 6.0.0-7.0.0; Professional <= 5.5.1 or = 6.0.0-7.0.0; Web Player <= 5.5.1 or = 6.0.0-7.0.0; Desktop <= 6.5.1 or = 7.0.0; Automation Services <= 5.5.1 or = 6.0.0-7.0.0; Analyst <= 5.5.1 or = 6.0.0-7.0.0; Silver Fabric Enabler = 2.1.0Affected if Your exact product version appears in the affected versions list for that product
-
Verify if the deployment is internet-facingCheck network configuration for Web Player or Automation Services - review firewall rules, reverse proxy settings, or load balancer configuration that exposes these services to external networksAffected if Web Player or Automation Services is accessible from untrusted networks (internet or external LAN)
You are affected if any TIBCO Spotfire product from the list is installed and the version matches an affected version, especially if Web Player or Automation Services is internet-facing.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to the fixed versions (Analyst/Web Player 5.5.2+, 6.0.3+, 6.5.3+, 7.0.1+ or later) as indicated in the vendor advisory. Prioritize patching internet-facing Web Player and Automation Services deployments given the remote attack vector.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-4554 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-4554 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data