CVE-2015-4931
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedStack-based buffer overflow in the server in IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack 6.1 before 6.1.12.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted packet, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-4932, CVE-2015-4933, CVE-2015-4934, and CVE-2015-4935.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceStack-based buffer overflow in IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack server allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted packet. The vulnerability affects versions 6.1 before 6.1.12.1 and enables complete system compromise due to the ability to execute arbitrary code.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 6.1.0.0= 6.1.1.0= 6.1.7.2= 6.1.8.0= 6.1.8.1= 6.1.9.0= 6.1.9.1= 6.1.10.0= 6.1.10.1= 6.1.11.0= 6.1.11.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine if IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack is installedCheck the system for presence of IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack server components. Look for installation directories or use system inventory tools that may list this product.Affected if The product is present on the system
-
Identify the installed FastBack server versionUse the product's built-in version reporting mechanism or check the version information in the installation directory. Common methods include running version commands or inspecting version files in the installation path.Affected if The installed version is 6.1.0.0 through 6.1.11.1, or any version before 6.1.12.1
-
Verify the FastBack server service is runningCheck if the FastBack server service or process is active. This may involve checking running services on Windows or processes on Linux/Unix systems.Affected if The FastBack server service is running and exposed to network traffic
-
Confirm network exposure of the FastBack serverDetermine if the FastBack server port is accessible from the network. Check firewall rules and network configurations to see if the server is listening on exposed network interfaces.Affected if The server is reachable over the network without proper access controls
If IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack version 6.1.x (where x is any version before 12.1) is installed and the server is running and network-accessible, the environment is affected by this vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack to version 6.1.12.1 or later to remediate the stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability.
6.1.12.1 or later
- Verify current IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack version by checking the server or using: dsmc query session or checking the installed program version
- Download IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack version 6.1.12.1 or later from the IBM Support Portal using the vendor patch URL: http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21961928
- Schedule a maintenance window to minimize business impact
- Stop the Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack server services before upgrading
- Install the upgrade to version 6.1.12.1 following the IBM installation documentation
- Start the Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack server services after installation
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the new version number
- Confirm the server is functioning normally and accepting connections
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-4931 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-4931 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data